Previous Page Table of Contents


LIST OF APPENDICES


APPENDIX 1 - LIST OF PARTICIPANTS - LISTE DES PARTICIPANTS - LISTA DE PARTICIPANTES
APPENDIX II - REVISED DRAFT STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK

APPENDIX 1 - LIST OF PARTICIPANTS - LISTE DES PARTICIPANTS - LISTA DE PARTICIPANTES

CHAIRPERSON

Mr. Thomas J. Billy
Administrator
Food Safety and Inspection Service
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Room 331 - E James Whitten Bldg
1400 Independence Ave., SW
Washington, D.C. 20250
U.S.A.

Phone: +1.202.7207025
Fax: +1.202.2050158
Email: [email protected]
VICE-CHAIRPERSONS

Dr. Stuart Slorach
Deputy-Director-General
National Food Administration
PO Box 622
S-75126 Uppsala
Sweden

Phone:+46.18.175594
Fax: +46.18.105848
Email: [email protected]
Dr. D.B. Nhari
Government Analyst
Ministry of Health and Child Welfare
P.O. Box CY 231
Causeway
Harare
Zimbabwe
Phone: +263.4.792026/7
Fax: +263.4.708527
Email:
Ing. Gonzalo Ríos
Encargado de Negociaciones Internacionales
Servicio Agrícola y Ganadero
Ministerio de Agricultura
Avenida Bulnes 140
Santiago
Chile
Phone: +56.2.6883811
Fax: +56.2.6717419
Email: [email protected]
REGIONAL
REPRESENTATIVE FOR
AFRICA

Dr. C. J.S. Mosha
Chief Standards Officer
Food Safety and Quality
Head, Agriculture and Food Section
Codex Contact Point Officer
Tanzania Bureau of Standards
P.O. Box 9524
Dar Es Salaam
Tanzania

Phone: +255.22.450298
Fax: +255 22 45095
Email: [email protected] [email protected]
REGIONAL
REPRESENTATIVE FOR
ASIA

Prof. Dr. Ma. Concepción Lizada
Director
Bureau of Agriculture and Fisheries Product Standards
BPI Cpd., Elliptical Rd.
Diliman
Quezon City 1101
Philippines

Phone: +63 2 920 6131-33
Fax: +63 2 920 6134
Email: [email protected]
REGIONAL
REPRESENTATIVE FOR
EUROPE

Dr. Carol Buy
Ministère de l'agriculture et de la pêche
Direction générale de l'alimentation
251 rue de Vaugirard
75732 Paris Cédex 15
France

Phone: +33 01 49 55 48 64
Fax: +33 01 49 55 59 48
Email: [email protected]
ADVISER TO THE
REGIONAL
REPRESENTATIVE FOR
EUROPE

Mrs. Roseline Lecourt
Chargée de Mission
Direction Gènèrale de la Concurrence de la Consommation
et de la Repression des Fraudes
Teledoc 051
59 Bld. Vincent Auriol
75013 Paris Cedex 13
France

Phone: +33.01.44 97 34 70
Fax: +33.01.44 97 30 37
Email: [email protected]
REGIONAL
REPRESENTATIVE FOR
LATIN AMERICA AND
THE CARIBBEAN

Ms. Maria Aparecida Martinelli
Coordinator of the Brazilian Codex Committee
Officer of INMETRO
Ministry of Development, Industry and Trade
SEPN 511, ED Bittar III
Bloco 'B', 4o Andar, Brasilia - DF
Brazil CEP 70750-527

Phone: +55 61 340 2211
Fax: +55 61 347 3284
Email: [email protected]
ADVISER TO REGIONAL
REPRESENTATIVE FOR
LATIN AMERICA AND
THE CARIBBEAN

Ms Maria Teresa Rodrigues Rezende
Secretaria-Executivo do Comitè do Codex
Alimentarius do Brasil
CCAB/INMETRO
Instiuto Nacional de Metrologia, Normalizacào e Qualidade
Industrial
W3 Norte Quadra 511
4º andar
Edificio Bittar III
Brasilia - DF
Brazil CEP 70750-527

Phone: +55 61 340 2211
Fax: +55 61 347 3284
Email: [email protected]
REGIONAL
REPRESENTATIVE FOR
NORTH AMERICA

Mr. Ron B. Burke
Director, Bureau of Food Regulatory, International and Interagency
Affairs
Food Directorate, Health Products and Food Branch
Health Canada
Room 2395, H.P.B. Building (0702C1)
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L2
Canada

Phone: +1 613 9571748
Fax: +1 613 9413537
Email: [email protected]
ADVISERS TO REGIONAL
REPRESENTATIVE FOR
NORTH AMERICA

Dr. F. Edward Scarbrough
Manager, U.S. Codex Office
Food Safety and Inspection Service
U.S. Department of Agriculture
1400 Independence Avenue, SW
Washington D.C. 20250-3700
U.S.A.

Phone: + 1 202 720 2057
Fax: + 1 202 720-3157
Email: [email protected]
Dr. Anne A. MacKenzie
Associate Vice President
Canadian Food Inspection Agency
59 Camelot Drive
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0Y9
Phone: +1 613 225.2342 Ext. 4188
Fax: +1 613 228.6638
Email: [email protected]
REGIONAL
REPRESENTATIVE FOR
SOUTH WEST PACIFIC

Dr Gardner Murray
Australian Chief Veterinary Officer, and
Executive Manager
Product Integrity, Animal and Plant Health
Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry – Australia
GPO Box 858
Canberra ACT 2601
Australia

Phone: +61 2 6272 5848
Fax: +61 2 6272 5697
Email: [email protected]
ADVISERS TO REGIONAL
REPRESENTATIVE FOR
SOUTH WEST PACIFIC

Mr. Peter Francis Liehne
General Manager
Standards
Australia New Zealand Food Authority
GPO Box 7186
Canberra MC ACT 2601
Australia

Phone: +61 2 6271 2246
Fax: +61 2 6271 2278
Email: [email protected]
Mr Sundararaman Rajasekar
Codex Coordinator and Contact Point for New Zealand
MAF Policy
Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry
PO Box 2526
Wellington
New Zealand
Phone: +64 4 474 4216
Fax: +64 4 473 0118
Email: [email protected]
OBSERVERS
COORDINATOR FOR
AFRICA

Dr. Eve Kasirye-Alemu
Executive Director
Uganda National Bureau
of Standards
P.O. Box 6329
Kampala
Uganda

Phone: +256.41.222367/9
Fax: +256.41.286123
E-mail: [email protected]
COORDINATOR FOR
EUROPE

Dr. Felipe Mittelbrunn
Consejero Técnico
Secretaría de la Comisión Interministerial para la Ordenación
Alimentaria
Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo
Paseo del Prado 18-20
28071 Madrid
Spain

Phone:+34 91.596.13.46
Fax: +34 91.596.44.87
Email: [email protected]
COORDINATOR FOR
NORTH AMERICA AND
THE SOUTH WEST
PACIFIC

Dr. Melanie O'Flynn
Director
Residues and Standards
Product Integrity, Animal and Plant Health Group
Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry – Australia
GPO Box 858
Canberra ACT 2601
Australia

Phone: +61 2 6272 4549
Fax: +61 2 6272 4023
Email: [email protected]
SECRETARIAT

Dr. A.W. Randell
Secretary, Codex Alimentarius Commission
Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme
Food and Nutrition Division
FAO, Rome

Phone: +39.06.570.54390
Fax: +39.06.570.54593
Email: [email protected]
FOOD AND
AGRICULTURE
ORGANIZATION OF THE
UNITED NATIONS (FAO)

Mr. J.L. Jouve
Chief
Food Quality and Standards Service
Food and Nutrition Division
FAO, Rome

Phone: +39.06.570.57055858
Fax: +39.06.570.54593
Email: [email protected]
WORLD HEALTH
ORGANIZATION (WHO)

Dr. J. Schlundt
Coodinator
Programme on Food Safety
World Health Organization
20 Avenue Appia
CH-1211 Geneva 27
Switzerland

Phone: +41.22.79.13445
Fax: +41.22.79.14807
Email: [email protected]
WORLD HEALTH
ORGANIZATION (WHO)

Dr. Yoshiko Saito
Scientist, Food Safety
Department of Protection of the Human Environment
Sustainable Development and Health Environments
World Health Organization
20 Avenue Appia
CH-1211 Geneva 27
Switzerland

Phone: +41 22 791 4324
Fax: +41 22 791 4807
Email: [email protected]
LEGAL COUNSEL
WHO

Mr. Gianluca Burci
Senior Officer
Office of the Legal Counsel
WHO, Geneva

Phone: +41.22.791.4754
Fax:
Email: [email protected]

APPENDIX II - REVISED DRAFT STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK


INTRODUCTION
DECISION-MAKING BASED ON SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES AND PRIORITIES

STRATEGIC VISION STATEMENT

The Codex Alimentarius Commission envisages a world afforded the highest attainable levels of consumer protection, including food safety and quality. To this end, the Commission will develop internationally agreed standards and related texts for use in domestic regulation and international trade in food that are based on scientific principles and fulfil the objectives of consumer health protection and fair practices in food trade.


INTRODUCTION

1. This document sets out the strategic priorities for the Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC) and provides the basis for the elaboration of the Medium Term Plan for the period 2003-2007. The strategic vision and goals for Codex underpin the high priority attached to food safety by its parent organizations, the FAO and the WHO. The FAO Strategic framework for 2000-2015 accords high priority to promoting policy and regulatory frameworks for food at the international and national levels. Similarly the 53rd Session of the World Health Assembly recognized the need to highlight health considerations in international food trade and acknowledged the importance of the CAC for assuring the highest levels of consumer health protection. The resolution also urged WHO to work towards integrating food safety as one of its essential public health functions with the goal of developing sustainable, integrated food safety systems for the reduction of health risk along the entire food chain. The fundamental mandate of the CAC is to develop international standards and norms for consumer health protection and fair practices in the food trade.

2. The CAC has always operated in an environment of change and technological advancement. The growth in world food trade, advances in modern communication and increasing mobility of populations are all contributing to elevating the profile and significance of food safety and regulation. There is growing international concern related to a perceived emergence/increase in food-borne diseases. Consumers around the world are becoming more aware than ever about food safety issues and are seeking ever-greater assurances about the safety and quality of foods they eat. Innovation and the development of new processes (including modern biotechnology) are leading to the development of new products with specific medical, nutritional and functional attributes. In its endeavour to promote food safety and quality, the CAC needs to consider opportunities for strengthening partnerships with all stakeholders, in particular consumers and their representative organizations, at the global and national levels. A further development is the growing interest in organic foods, which are likely to capture a significant share of the international market in the future. It is also likely that developing countries will account for an increasing proportion of global food and agricultural trade. These developments, while exciting, also present new challenges (both safety and non safety) for the CAC and national governments.

3. The new recognition and status that Codex standards, guidelines and other recommendations acquired under the WTO Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (the SPS Agreement) also brought new challenges and responsibilities including the need to ensure that its standards and related texts are based on scientific principles and meet the needs and mandate of the organization. The WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade is also of great relevance given the significance of the provisions pertaining to product description, labelling, packaging and quality descriptors for consumer information and fair practices in trade. Although quality provisions are fundamentally driven by the market, the CAC has an important role in ensuring that provisions relating to quality are sound and based on the criteria of essentiality and do not constitute disguised barriers to trade.

4. These developments have generated renewed interest in the work of the CAC and have resulted in a substantial growth in membership of the organization with developing countries now accounting for a majority of total membership. Given the importance that the WTO attaches to international harmonization, there is now an even greater imperative for CAC and its members to ensure that the Organization maintains its pre-eminent status as the internationally recognized body for food standards and its norms are applied to the widest extent possible by all members as a basis for domestic regulation and international trade.

DECISION-MAKING BASED ON SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE

5. The scientific basis of decision-making by the CAC is spelt out in the Statements of Principle on the Role of Science in the Codex Decision-Making and the Extent to which Other Factors are Taken into Account[9]. The CAC does not undertake scientific evaluations per se but relies on the opinions of scientific expert Committees or Consultations convened by FAO and WHO on specific issues. These expert bodies such as the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committees on Food Additives and the Joint FAO/WHO Meetings on Pesticide Residues are independent of the CAC and it subsidiary bodies and do not fall within the scope of the present Strategic Framework. The mandates, functions, composition and agendas of these bodies are established by FAO and WHO. Although the independence of the expert bodies is critical to the objectivity of their opinions, meetings of these bodies normally take into account the advice of the CAC as indicated in Article 1 of the Commission's Statutes. There is considerable synergy between the scientific panels of FAO and WHO and the intergovernmental bodies of the CAC in order to take decisions based on scientific evidence.

STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES AND PRIORITIES

6. The fundamental objective of the Codex Alimentarius Commission is to establish sound internationally agreed guidelines for national food control systems based on the criteria of consumer health protection and fair practices in trade and taking into account the needs and special concerns of all countries. All of the objectives listed below are considered to be equally important to the overall achievement of the strategic vision.

Objective 1: Promoting Sound Regulatory Framework

7. In many countries, effective food control is undermined by the existence of fragmented legislation, multiple jurisdictions and weaknesses in surveillance, monitoring and enforcement. Sound national food control and regulatory systems are essential to assuring the health and safety of domestic population as well as assuring the safety and quality of foods entering international trade. While the establishment of regulatory framework is fundamentally a national responsibility, the CAC and its parent bodies, the FAO and WHO, have a strong interest in promoting national regulatory systems that are based on international principles and guidelines and address all components of the food chain. The development of sound food control and regulatory infrastructure including human resources is particularly important for developing countries as they seek to achieve higher levels of food safety and nutrition and will require high level political and policy commitment as highlighted in the report of the 1999 Melbourne Conference on International Food Trade Beyond 2000.[10] An effective food control system is critical in enabling all countries to assure the safety of their foods entering international trade and to ensure that imported foods conform to national requirements. Successful negotiation of bilateral mutual recognition and/or equivalence also depends on the ability of countries to assure each other of the integrity of national regulatory systems.

8. The priorities for the CAC will be to:

Objective 2: Promoting Widest Application of Scientific Principles and Risk Analysis

9. The CAC will promote and further strengthen its capacity to include health considerations in its standards and guidelines through the widest possible application of risk analysis based on Codex principles. Risk analysis as it applies to food, is an emerging discipline and will require ongoing and sustained inputs from the Commission, its parent organizations and national governments to promote conceptual development and application at the international and national levels. Risk Communication will be vital to this process. The early implementation of the CAC Action Plan on Risk Analysis by the Commission and member governments is essential to:

10. The CAC will also need to accord high priority to ongoing development of concepts and principles and the establishment of sound working principles for the application of risk analysis both at international and national levels. It should also promote better understanding of risk analysis through technical assistance programmes. A strengthened expert scientific evaluation structure for addressing chemical, microbiological hazards and emerging pathogens will also be critical to support and underpin the Codex standards development processes.

11. Consistent with the Statements of Principle, adopted by CAC in 1995, the Commission will need to have due regard, where appropriate, to other legitimate factors relevant to health protection of consumers when developing standards and guidelines. International consensus on the scope and application of other legitimate factors in Codex decision making will be essential for their sound and consistent application right across the Codex system.

Objective 3: Promoting Seamless Linkages/Interface between Codex and other Multilateral Regulatory Instruments and Conventions

12. The CAC does not and cannot operate in isolation. It needs to work closely with other relevant international standards setting and regulatory bodies to promote close cooperation and dialogue on matters of common interest. As the WTO-recognized international body for establishing food safety standards the Commission has a clear obligation to establish international food standards for the protection of consumers' health and ensuring fair practices in food trade, and these standards may be used by Member countries in both domestic regulation and international trade. At the same time the Commission needs to interact closely with related international bodies and take due account of international regulatory initiatives and developments and ensure that its outputs are consistent with relevant international conventions and agreements. Such cooperation is also important to minimize duplication of effort. Food safety and issues such as biotechnology are of global interest and are the subjects of debate and discussion in a number of multilateral institutions. The CAC has, by virtue of its lead role in international food standards, a strategic interest in working closely with relevant multilateral institutions and conventions (OIE, WTO, OECD, CBD/Biosafety Protocol, UNECE, IPPC and others) to provide its technical input and expertise and contribute to building international consensus on contemporary food standards and regulatory policy matters.

Objective 4: Enhance Capacity to Respond Effectively and Expeditiously to New Issues, Concerns and Developments in the Food Sector

13. With the rapid development of technology and emergence of food safety as a major issue of public policy, there is a need to enhance the capacity of Codex to respond to members' needs in a way that maintains confidence in its ability as the international organization for food standards. There are a number of important considerations in this context. A major issue for Codex is the length of time it takes to establish standards. Codex processes are too protracted and are not responsive to current expectations and public policy imperatives. Governments around the world are having to grapple with significant regulatory challenges and Codex, as the global food standards setting body, needs to be able to respond effectively and expeditiously through the development of internationally harmonized solutions to food safety and international trade matters. A refocusing of the manner in which the Commission and its subsidiary bodies produce outcomes must be a strategic priority. The key functions of a refocused Commission would be to:

14. At the subsidiary body level, major improvements can be achieved through the establishment of time-limited procedures and through a review of the current step procedure. Timely development of standards will also require improved alignment of the timing and frequency of meetings of commodity and general subject committees.

15. As noted in the introductory sections, the parent bodies of the Commission accord high priority to food safety and international standards development programmes. Host governments also provide significant financial support. Ultimately, however, the ability of Codex to fulfil its mandate and respond to the growing needs and expectations of its members will depend on the availability of additional resources. Codex meetings and related activities already represent a heavy workload and further intensification of work will require additional financial and human resources.

Objective 5: Promoting Maximum Membership and Participation

16. Full participation by all Codex Members and other interested parties in the work of the CAC and its subsidiary bodies is now more important than ever. The participation of all members and relevant intergovernmental and non governmental organizations is critical to sound decision-making and ensuring that Codex standards and related texts take account of the full range of interest and viewpoints. Since the early nineties there has been a significant increase in the membership of Codex with developing countries now constituting a significant proportion of total membership. Notwithstanding this growth in membership many countries are still faced with serious financial and human resource constraints to effective participation in Codex activities. Achieving the objective of maximum participation will require specific and ongoing action to address the following:

· Resource constraints- Early action is required to facilitate the effective participation of developing countries in Codex standards development activities, including financial assistance from extrabudgetary resources where possible;

· Capacity building - There is a continuing need to invest in capacity building programmes aimed at strengthening national Codex administrative and consultative structures (e.g., Codex Contact Point and National Codex Committee) and provide for enhancing national capacity for technical analysis and participation in international standards development activities. This requires bilateral or multilateral technical assistance and should include training.

17. In addition to actions to promote participation of member countries, the CAC also needs to continue its efforts to promote and facilitate the participation of consumers and public interest groups in its processes both at the international and national levels. Given the strong public interest in food safety and regulatory issues, the involvement and input of consumers and non governmental groups is essential to build public confidence in international standards and assure the strong public input, acceptance and support for Codex standards, guidelines and recommendations as a basis for domestic regulation and trade.

Objective 6: Promoting Maximum Application of Codex Standards

18. As the pre-eminent international standards setting body for food, the CAC has a clear and strategic interest in promoting the maximum use of its standards both for domestic regulation and international trade. International harmonization based on Codex standards, guidelines and recommendations is essential to promoting a global approach to consumer health protection (including systems for the reduction of food- borne risks) and minimizing the negative effects of technical regulations on international trade. This will require sustained commitment and effort in the following key directions:

Transparency of the criteria and process of risk assessment and decision making will be paramount to achieving this objective;

· The Commission must complete the strategic shift, first signaled at the 1991 FAO/WHO International Conference on Food Standards, Chemicals in Food and Food Trade, towards performance-based standards and guidelines for broad application across a range of commodities and focus on provisions essential for consumer health protection and facilitation of trade;

· Codex must ensure that its standards and guidelines reflect the needs and special concerns of the developing world without compromising on the health of consumers; and

· Codex decisions should be based on consensus to the maximum extent possible.

Implementation of the Strategic Vision and Objectives

19. The strategic objectives described in this document will require a plan of action and implementation strategy. These matters will be addressed within the framework of the Medium Term Plan for 2003-2007.


[9] Codex Alimentarius Commission, Procedural Manual, Eleventh Edition, p. 180
[10] Report of the Conference on International Food Trade beyond 2000:Science based Decisions, Harmonization, Equivalence and Mutual Recognition, Melbourne, Australia, 11-15 October, 1999, Appendix 1, p.29.
[11] Codex Alimentarius Commission, Procedural Manual, Eleventh Edition, p. 180.
[12] Codex Alimentarius Commission, Report of 23rd session, Rome, 28 June-3 July 1999, p. 10-11.

Previous Page Top of Page