Previous Page Table of Contents Next Page


3. Working with farmers and traders


Those who are likely to use a market must be involved in its planning. The purpose of Stage 3 is to initiate a dialogue with market users to jointly identify the problems they face and possible solutions. This involves working with farmers, traders, consumers and local communities. By the end of the Stage:

An overall social assessment should have been undertaken with the market users (communities, producers and traders).

If a market management committee did not exist, one should have been established.

Special needs (such as for women traders) should have been identified and included in the needs assessment and the users’ needs should have been prioritised.

STAGE 3
WORKING WITH FARMERS AND TRADERS

A participatory approach

Before decisions are made about constructing new markets or improving existing markets full-scale consultations must be carried out with the likely users. These will obviously include farmers and traders and the needs of consumers must certainly be taken into account when planning retail markets. Such consultations should be designed to identify:

Consultation methods. There are many ways to consult with the users. A simple method is just to walk through a market with local traders and villagers and observe the existing conditions and problems. Another method is to use a simple questionnaire to find out the users’ opinions. For example, this might be used to find out the willingness of market traders to pay additional market fees for better facilities.

FAO/17860/A. Conti

Holding meetings with local people is an important way to ensure that new markets meet users’ needs.

FAO/16913/G. Thomas

Sometimes a more systematic approach is needed in order to gain insight into local conditions. An understanding of the cultural, social and marketing processes involved is required. The community’s perception of its marketing problems and their possible solutions also needs to be examined. The approaches used for consultation include:

Key informants. Both of the above methods usually rely on using key informants (local “experts”), including formal and informal leaders, traders, women’s group representatives and teachers. Acquiring an insight into local knowledge is a significant benefit of the RRA and PRA processes. Planners should attempt to reach a real cross section of the community. For example, in societies where women do most of the shopping, and where their contact with outside males is either forbidden or frowned upon, it is essential that interviews with consumers be conducted by women.

Women are frequently able to provide the most valuable information on local markets.

FAO/13866/M. Allara-Carlin

Step 3.1
Consult with the users

Consultations that may be needed for marketing projects are listed below:

Communities. Discussions with communities are necessary to identify their marketing problems. A common approach is to undertake a PRA or RRA, as mentioned above. There are similarities between the methods and both may be used together. For example, in circumstances where financing is already available for construction, a PRA may be used to help select the location of the new market. Where there may be the possibility to upgrade a market, but only if it is financially feasible, it would be unfair to raise people’s expectations and an RRA may be used to identify present marketing problems. Subsequently, if proposals are shown to be viable, planners may return to the community to conduct a PRA in order to work out the proposals in detail.

Producers. To best understand their marketing problems, discussions with producers are better held at farm level. It is necessary to discuss their problems regarding access to markets to sell their produce. Producers’ organizations or associations could also be approached.

Market traders. Unless a traders’ association exists, discussions with traders are usually best undertaken on a one-to-one basis. There is often a “senior” person or elder who may be delegated to talk for other traders. Where new markets are being considered, meetings should be held at the sites where farmers and traders currently conduct business.

Consumers. A market, however well built, will fail if consumers do not want to use it. The main factor that influences the acceptability of a market to consumers is usually the location. If a location has already been identified, its suitability must be discussed with a sample of retail shoppers; if no site has been identified, individual or group meetings must be held with consumers to identify possible locations.

The best way of holding discussions with the users is usually through a series of meetings. This process could start with a brief introductory meeting, followed by meetings with key informants of community organizations, producers and traders. A final gathering would be necessary to draw up an assessment of the users’ needs (see Step 3.3).

Existing trading patterns may help to identify possible locations when planning new markets.

FAO/17847/A. Conti

Step 3.2
Provide support to the market committee

The most effective method of involving users in market development is to ensure that they are fully represented on a market committee. Such a committee may already exist; if not, it may be necessary to set one up. This is not an easy step to undertake, but is essential for achieving a sustainable market.

The mandate of the committee should be as flexible as possible in order to accommodate changes in its membership and its powers. Members of the committee should include traders, producers, the market’s manager and transporters. If possible, consumers and women’s groups should also be represented. Financial support may be necessary for the setting up of a market committee. The types of temporary support that could be provided to a committee are:

Step 3.3
Assess user needs

As a result of consultations with market users a “needs assessment” can be developed. Once the problems have been identified, the users should try to prioritize them at the final meeting as a guide for the market designers (Stages 4 to 7) and as a basis for preparing an overall assessment of the project (Stage 8).When preparing the assessment it is a good idea to make experienced facilitators available at the meeting to help the users clarify and prioritize their problems. Facilitators could include representatives from the local departments of agriculture, planning, community development and rural engineering. Some of the physical, social and managerial issues that might be identified (based on the situation at an existing market) are shown in Table 3.

During consultations with the users some special requirements may be identified (such as a need for space to be reserved for women or cooperative groups). Such needs should initially be included in the overall assessment so that the practicality of meeting them is considered.

Table 3
Market needs assessment and ranking of users’ priorities
(1 = highest priority)

Problems with existing market facilities

Farmers

Traders

Managers

Overall score

Ranking

Lack of temporary sales space for producers at peak periods

31

313

310

24 ÷ 3 = 8.0

7

Lack of temporary buying space for assembly traders

32

312

39

23 ÷ 3 = 7.7

5

Produce presently being sold in the open, with consequent spoilage

33

314

314

31 ÷ 3 =10.3

12

Inadequate site security and overnight storage facilities

34

35

311

20 ÷ 3 = 6.7

4

Poor layout, inhibiting customer flow

311

32

312

25 ÷ 3 = 8.3

8

Lack of building repair and maintenance

314

34

38

26 ÷ 3 = 8.7

9

Vehicular and pedestrian congestion due to insufficient circulation space

38

33

37

18 ÷ 3 = 6.0

2

Lack of parking provision and areas for unloading

39

36

313

28 ÷ 3 = 9.3

10

Poor condition of roads and paving

310

37

36

23 ÷ 3 = 7.7

5

Inadequate drainage, with produce loss and potential health problems

37

39

315

31 ÷ 3 =10.3

12

Inadequate provision for the hygienic handling of meat, poultry and fish

312

38

316

36 ÷ 3 =12.0

16

A strong demand for new permanent trading spaces

315

311

35

31 ÷ 3 =10.3

12

Inefficient use of market sales space with low sales volume per trader and low rents

Ö 316

Ö 315

Ö 34

35 ÷ 3 =11.7

15

Difficulties in enforcing the present market regulations

36

310

32

18 ÷ 3 = 6.0

2

Inadequate market management, providing few facilities

35

31

33

9 ÷ 3 = 3.0

1

Under-funding, especially for repairs and maintenance

313

316

31

30 ÷ 3 =10.0

11


Previous Page Top of Page Next Page