|
1. |
POLICY environment |
|
|
1.a |
Title of the national AKIS policy, plan or formal agreement |
|
|
1.b |
Public goods targeted by AKIS policy |
|
|
1.c |
Indication of economic efficiency of agriculture sector, given AKIS |
|
|
2. |
INSTITUTIONAL structure for support of innovation |
|
|
2.a |
Name/number of public sector AKIS/RD units |
|
|
2.b |
Who responsible for central and branch supervision |
|
|
2.c |
What initiatives taken to build AKIS institutional resources (leadership/staff HRD) |
|
|
2.d |
What type/level of programme decentralization/ subsidiarity |
|
|
2.e |
Who responsible for M&E and impact assessment |
|
|
2.f |
Indication of functional performance of AKIS entities |
|
|
3. |
CONDITIONS for expression of demand for innovation |
|
|
3.a |
Evidence of demand-driven orientation in public programmes |
|
|
3.b |
Investment in agricultural market development |
|
|
3.c |
Availability/access to input supplies (credit, supplies) |
|
|
3.d |
Adequate physical infrastructure |
|
|
3.e |
Joint planning between which agencies/how effective are linkages? |
|
|
3.f |
Agricultural producers HRD |
|
|
3.g |
Indication of gender inclusion |
|
|
4. |
PARTNERSHIPS and NETWORKS |
|
|
4.a |
What structures for effective institutional cooperation |
|
|
4.b |
Example of strong public-private partnerships (pluralism) |
|
|
4.c |
Evidence of programme participation by APs (and RPOs) |
|
|
4.d |
Example of effective use of traditional communication technology |
|
|
4.e |
Example of effective use of modern computer/internet technology |
|
|
5. |
FINANCING systems for innovation |
|
|
5.a |
Figures showing adequate funding for AKIS/RD |
|
|
5.b |
Type of repartition of costs (fee-based cost-sharing) |
|
|
5.c |
Type of investments to develop stakeholder capacities |
|
Text in bold italics indicates the original nine principles of
AKIS.
AP = agricultural producer; HRD = human resource development; M&E =
monitoring and evaluation; RPO = rural producer organization.
