全球粮食安全与营养论坛 (FSN论坛)

意见征集

《食物权准则》20周年 —— 征集有关实现人类充足食物权的意见和建议的通知

        2024 年是《在国家粮食安全背景下推动逐步实现充足食物权的自愿准则》(《食物权准则》) 通过 20 周年。

  食物权是一项具有法律约束力的权利,受《经济、社会及文化权利国际公约》的保障。根据经济、社会及文化权利委员会 (CESCR) 第 12 号一般性意见所规定,每个人在所有时候都能在物质和经济方面获得足够食物或有购买食物的手段时,该权利才得以实现。

        《食物权准则》为各国如何通过制定战略、计划、政策和立法实现充足食物权提供了实用指导。经过历时两年的政府间谈判和多利益攸关方参与,该《准则》得到了世界粮食安全委员会(粮安委)的认可,并于 2004 年 11 月由粮农组织理事会通过。

        各国政府有法律义务确保食物权,且每个人都有权不受歧视地享受这一普遍权利。此外,我们所有人,无论个人或集体,包括政府官员、立法者、地方社区、非政府组织、学术界、消费者组织、青年团体、土著人民、小农、妇女组织、民间社会组织以及私营部门,都是实现充足食物权的关键主体。

        《食物权准则》预见到当今实现可持续发展面临急切全球挑战的紧迫性,包括冲突、不平等、疾病、气候变化和生物多样性的丧失。在我们挑战不断增长和变化的复杂世界中,该《准则》一如既往地具有重要意义。它们提醒我们,国际合作与协作对消除饥饿、各种形式的营养不良、贫困和不平等的集体公共利益至关重要。其全面落实有助于我们努力实现以人权为基础的《2030年可持续发展议程》及其可持续发展目标

        由于2019新冠肺炎疫情、各种形式的饥饿和营养不良问题与日俱增、不平等问题加剧以及生活成本危机,过去 5 年极具挑战。各国政府和全球其他主体采取了创新对策。20 年过去了,现今正值盘点进展并研究要点的恰当时机。

 

期待您的重要意见和建议!

        展望《食物权准则》20 周年,本次征集活动的结果将有助于了解在地方、国家、区域或全球层面为实现充足食物权所作努力,并为各国及其人民提供重要的盘点机会。

        粮农组织食物权团队和世界粮食安全委员会(粮安委)邀请利益攸关方.

1.
分享在实现每个人在所有时候都享有食物权方面的经验良好做法
2.
阐明在实现食物权或落实《食物权准则》中遇到的各种差距制约挑战
 
3.
在实现充足食物权方面分享经验教训并提出改善建议
 
4.
下一步:是否有(进一步)采用和适用《准则》的具体计划

 

如何参与本次征集活动

        请使用以下模板分享您的经验:鏈接到模板

        可使用六种联合国语言(阿拉伯文、中文、英文、法文、俄文和西班牙文)中的任何一种提交。请将提交内容长度限制在 1,000 字以内。您可将完成的表格在此处上传,或发送至 [email protected]

 

徵件截止日期為 2023 12 17 日。

        我们非常感谢您的宝贵贡献,并期待学习您的经验。

共同主持人:

  • Marie-Lara Hubert-Chartier,食物权专家
  • Claire Mason,食物权顾问
  • Sarah Brand,准专业官员
  • Chiara Cirulli, 糧安委秘書處

 

参考材料

 

*点击姓名阅读该成员的所有评论并与他/她直接联系
  • 阅读 112 提交内容
  • 扩展所有

Monica Nderitu

Vi Agroforestry
Kenya

Hello,

I am writing to submit for the FAO's 20th Anniversary Right to Food Guidelines on behalf of Vi Agroforestry.

I apologize for any inconvenience caused by the recall of the previous submission. As mentioned earlier, there was a failure to attach two key documents that were required with the submission. 

Please find attached the completed application form, along with the required supporting documents.

Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

David Maeri

Regional Communications Officer

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Vi-skogen/Vi Agroforestry

Visiting address Ikigai Nairobi Westlands, Off Peponi Road

Nairobi KENYA

www.viagroforestry.org

Hi,

 I totally agree with the Right to Food agenda for food security. People should have a choice in what they eat and from where, how it was produced, and how nutritious it is.

Kindly find attached my contribution to this 20th anniversary for the launch of the right to food guidlines, hoping the world achieves its drive toward eradicating hunger, driving mainly by poverty.

Regards,

Yusuf Hassan-Maiwa.

I present hereunder a case study (our experience) “Iron‑Enriched Fish Powder Improved Haemoglobin Levels in Adolescent Girls of West Jaintia Hills District of Meghalaya, India” carried out by Asha Kurukkan Kunnath, Suseela Mathew, Mukteswar Prasad Mothadaka and Ravishankar Chandragiri Nagaraja Rao, published in Biol Trace Elem Res 200, 2017–2024 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12011-021-02820-0.

The efficacy of sodium iron EDTA (NaFeEDTA) salt-enriched fish powder in addressing iron deficiency in adolescent anaemic girls was assessed in a 60-day randomised double-blinded, controlled intervention trial involving 123 girls age ranging from 10 to 19 years in three villages of West Jaintia Hills District of State of Meghalaya in India using soup made out of sodium iron EDTA (NaFeEDTA)-enriched fish powder (250 mg/100 g). The influence of the iron-enriched powder on blood haemoglobin levels and serum iron was determined. The work also analysed the food consumed by the subjects during the study period and it was found that there were no significant differences between the iron-enriched and control groups. The results indicated that the girls predominantly consumed cereals with little fruits, vegetables and meat. On an average, 100 ml of soup prepared out of 10 g of fish powder per day was consumed that theoretically provided about 25 mg of iron each day. Following intervention, all the participants in the group that consumed soup made out of NaFeEDTA-enriched fish powder had significantly higher haemoglobin levels and serum iron and a lower prevalence of anaemia than the control group. The effects of NaFeEDTA salt-enriched fish powder were statistically significant and it can be inferred that NaFeEDTA-enriched fish powder was highly effective in controlling iron deficiency and reducing the prevalence of iron-deficiency anaemia among the adolescent girls

 From right to food perspective the major impediment is lack and access to nutritive food especially in hinterland areas. For instance, the low cost fish available in coastal areas, but the transportation from these areas (West Coast of India) to North Eastern states makes the cost prohibitive due to 1. Long distance transportation 2. Perishable nature of fish 3. Availability (supply) of fish on continuous basis for the reasons of dwindling catches in natural marine sources, impact of climate changes on fish resources, increase in expenditures harvesting efforts in turn increase in cost of fish. COVID-19 played a significant role as in post COVID period cost of all food items increased significantly

One of the best ways to improve the right to food condition is 1. Employment of rural and low cost technological interventions in storing glut production of various foods and development value added products to suit local needs. This can result in minimizing the staggering losses, enhanced utilization  and availability food in off seasons.

 Concerted efforts are in need to make sure the food is acceptable to the needy   

Anabel Fiorella Espinosa De Candido

UNICEF
Mexico

To whom it may concern,

Please find attached UNICEF´s submission related to the Mexican experience on the realization of the human right to adequate food.

 Best regards,

A. Fiorella Espinosa De Candido

Oficial de Nutrición

UNICEF México

Dear Sir/Ma,

Call for inputs on the realization of the Human Right to Adequate Food

My little contribution for the submission,

My stake on this, is that, nobody should be excluded from adequate food system. It is a right for all not a privilege. We are all entitled to adequate and well-nourished food for healthy living. We survive on this, therefore, no discrimination! But individuals and nations must also strategies on how to meet this right in order to fulfill the purpose and objectives for continuous living on earth.

When you look at the creatures you will see that there was enough for man but how to go about it has always been the challenges which are ‘strategies and implementation’. The strategies to employ and deploy to meet the need and adequate food system is a global concern for all the actors and non-actors in the food system economy. Despite this, there have also been modalities and solutions to this demand and shortage of supply of food for all across the globe. I would like to say that the major issue has been the migration or drift of man from Agricultural products to science and technology which is equally affecting the climate of the earth.

History has also noted that farmers were adequately sufficient for their immediate family before the advent of science and technology which led to mechanize farming and others that have depleted the ozone as a result of innovation thereby drifting man afar from primary responsibility need of the family. This was a period of natural food system for immediate family survival and living. This kept hunger afar off from the family. But the era of technology eroded this system and brought more hunger which was denied at the initial stage until these days. In other words, we are all guilty of this erroneous system of science and technology.

But, if we can look back, this can be fixed and it would generates the needed adequate food system for family. The natural food system would be made available again for healthy living; if we are really serious and interested in this investment for mankind.

However, the depleting ozone is as a result of this science and technology which is part of farming effect. As a result of climate change, the emission of toxic carbon generated from science and technology that has little or no contribution to human existence is a major factor that needs to be address by nations, especially United Nations (UN). These are unnecessary innovations, things to human existence but posing as a threat to humanity on earth and causing harm and hunger in the world, even to the global north and south. This needs to be seriously addressed and resolution needs to be pass that would effectively implement it adequately by UN and nations involved. In other words, these science and technology should be do away or minimize to allow what will benefit mankind and the earth to evolve.

These are ways to curb the effect on food and appropriate steps should be taken to mitigate the proliferation of these toxic science and technology emission to human existence. More so, every man should be encouraged to see the need of subsistence farming for immediate family needs. This can be done through loans (financial support), lands provision for farmers and even commercial system.

Furthermore, insecurity is another challenges arising from global south that needs to be supported by security outfit or intelligence for adequate food system. For example, Nigeria, encountered this for years especially (2014-2023) and that affected her outcome of production which resulted to escalation of prices in food commodities. It was a major threat to food security in the country. Her exports on these goods dropped, thereby, affected the countries she supplies the commodities to. So, insecurity that affect farmers is a global challenge to the benefactors and beneficiaries of the products. Meanwhile, food insecurity causes shortage of food products and leads to hunger because of demand is more than supply. Nevertheless, this can be addressed by a serious government with adequate policies that will incorporates the welfare and protection of farmers’ lives and properties.

Ultimately, majority of farmers’ needs and challenges can be addressed by the government of the nation as the state-actor, like climate change, loans to assist farmers, land provision and adequate security. All these are national issues to be solved and resolved by state-actors for non-state-actors to maximize their contributions and wellbeing. The private sectors can also play a role but the first point of contact are the state-actors.

To buttress my points, the resolutions by UN should cut short or minimize unnecessary science and technology that affect climate with serious action and if possible due sanction should be meted on defaulters to serve as deterrence. The policies in place should be review and vigorously pursue for implementation to mitigate these effect. United Nations should be responsible for this implementation, whether global north or south with adequate programmes. Once these are done, with individuals roles, there would be less hunger in the world.

Thank you.

Esosa.

Ariela Doc

Comida y Cultura, Ariela Doctors
Brazil

Dear all,



Below is our proposal for the Call for contributions on the realization of the Human Right to Adequate Food.



Attached is also a brief presentation containing the project in question, Cozinhas & Infâncias, which is a partnership between the Food and Culture Institute and the Faculty of Public Health of the University of São Paulo.



We remain at your disposal for clarification or further information.



Yours sincerely,

Comida y Cultura

Mathilde Chiesa

Concern Worldwide UK
United Kingdom

Dear Sir, Madam,

In response to the call for inputs on the realization of the Human Right to Adequate Food made on your website, please find enclosed our submission, on behalf of Concern Worldwide UK.

I remain at your disposal should you have any questions regarding our contribution.

Kind Regards,

Mathilde

Mathilde Chiesa

Senior Policy Officer (Hunger and Nutrition) | Concern Worldwide UK