THE PORTUGUESE FISHERY IN THE CECAF AREA IN 1980–1983
by Manuel Lima Dias
Instituto Nacional de Investigaçao das Pescas, Lisbon
1. INTRODUCTION
In the 1960's, the Portuguese fishery in the CECAF area was rather important with more than 40 trawlers fishing mainly in divisions 34.1.3 and 34.3.1. For internal as well as international reasons, the number of fishing vessels and trips have gradually declined. Thus, in 1980, the fleet consisted of only 23 vessels, of which 13 carry ice and 10 are refrigerated. The total tonnages are respectively 5085 and 5101 GRT. The main species caught, the hakes, were gradually replaced by Plectorhynchus mediterraneus (rubberlip grunt) and Sparus caeruleostictus (bluespotted seabream). Recently, the artisanal fishery has taken the place of the trawl fishery. The main gears used being in order of importance gillnets and longlines.
2. STATISTICS
Catch statistics have always been difficult to obtain in the Portuguese fishery and the recent shift towards the artisanal fishery has increased this problem. Although as yet imperfect Portugal has regularly presented STATLANT 34A forms on its trawl catches. Table 1 presents a corrected version of some of the figures previously presented since 1980. In table 2 are summarized catches by species or species group landed by trawlers during the period 1975– 1983 together with some data on the corresponding fishing effort. This table shows the decline in the hake catches which declined from 10% of the total catch in 1980 to only 1.4% in 1983. For the hakes caught with longlines and gillnets it is very difficult to obtain correct statistics by gear in the different fishing ports. It is therefore impossible for us to present data on the total catches of these two gears. In Lisbon, we sampled hakes landed by artisanal fishing boats in order to know the composition of the catches. Data here presented concern only the vessels sampled. In 1982, we also carried out some observations onboard a vessel fishing with gill nets and as well as on a trawler.
3. THE HAKE FISHERY
The basic data obtained from our sampling programme in Lisbon and other fishing ports allow us to reconstruct the composition of the hake landings by trawlers as presented in table 3 and figure 1. One can see that the mean length in the catch was similar in 1981 and 1982 and of the order of 39.8–39.9 cm, against 42.4 cm in 1983. The mean weight was however very similar in 1981 and 1983 (0.54 kg), and higher in 1982 (0,65 kg).
The length-frequency structure of the catch shows that in 1981 the dominating size classes were those between 34–35 and 42–43 cm, and in 1982 between 40–41 and 46–47 cm. In 1983, the most abundant fish were between 36–37 and 42–43 cm long, but the numbers of fish sampled were much lower as a result of the decline in trawl landings.
Table 4 and figure 2 show the amounts of hakes caught in 1975–1983 as well as the total fishing effort expressed in days and hours of fishing. Since 1977, the hakes ceased to be target species of the trawl fishery. In 1980, according to table 4, however, catches of hakes per unit of effort for as yet unexplained reasons rose to levels comparable to those of 1975– 1976.
As mentioned above, it is difficult to estimate the quantities of hakes landed by the artisanal fishery. The length composition of catches by longlines and gillnets landed at Lisbon during 1982 are shown in table 5 and figure 3. This figure shows that the gillnets the highest catches were made in the size classes 41–53 cm and in the longlines 43–55 cm. Data also exist on the structure of the hake landings in Lisbon during the year 1981 (Fig. 4). In table 6 this is compared with the structure of the trawl catch. A comparison of length structure of the hakes caught by longlines in 1981 and 1982 shows little difference with peaks at 46–47 to 54–55 cms.
In 1982 we made some observations on board a fishing vessel, using longlines, in division 34.3.1. The target species were hakes, of which the total catch was 6025 kg (2630 kg of M. merluccius and 3395 kg of M. senegalensis). Another significant species caught during this trip was the large-eye dentex (Dentex macrophthalmus) of which 4440 kg was caught. The following table shows the catches of each of the two species of hakes and the corresponding fishing effort. Catch rates of M. Senegalensis were highest.
Catch | Effort | CPUE | |
---|---|---|---|
(kg) | (h) | (kg/h) | |
European hake | 2630 | 48 | 54.8 |
Black hake | 3395 | 37 | 91.8 |
Table 7 and figure 5 illustrate the length composition of the catches of the two hake species. M. senegalensis was dominant in all size classes below 59–60 cm. The largest hake found (72–73 cm) was a M. merluccius.
During the same cruise, the sex ratio and sexual maturity stages were studied in both species. The results for M. merluccius (170 specimens analysed) are shown in table 8. The sex ratio was approximately 1 : 1.5 (females, males). 68% of the males were in maturity stage 4 and 5, and 75% of the females in 2 and 3. In M. senegalensis a sex ratio of 1:1 was observed (125 specimens). As in M. merluccius, most females were in maturity stages 2 and 3. Males, however, were mostly (84%) in stages 2 and 4, in equal proportions.
4. POMADASYIDAE AND SPARIDAE
As mentioned earlier, some other demersal species have taken over the place of the hake as target species in the Portuguese artisanal and trawl fisheries : the rubberlip grunt Plectorhynchus mediterraneus as well as the seabreams Sparus spp. and Dentex spp. Plectorhynchus has been studied since it became important in the landings. For lack of further information, a number of sparids, commonly called “pargos encarnados” in porguguese (red breams) are grouped together in the catch statistics in the categories Sparus spp. or Dentex spp. One of these species is the bluespotted seabream (Sparus caeruleostictus), which is also an important component of the Portuguese catches in the CECAF area.
Table 9 and figure 6 show for the individual years 1981–1983 the total numbers of P. mediterraneus landed by the trawl fishery. These data are new, as the weights shown below table 9 have so far never been presented on STATLANT forms. It appears from table 9 and figure 6 that the length composition of the P. mediterraneus landings show differences between each of the three years, 1983 being the farthest apart.
For the artisanal landings of these species, we had the same problems as already mentioned for the hakes. Some observations were made on the gill net catches in 1981 and 1982. They are reproduced in tables 10 (1981, 1982) and 11 (1982 by quarter), but concern only the fraction of the landings sampled. The total frequencies for 1982 are shown in figure 7. Fish in length ranges of 40–50 cm were predominant : the largest specimen caught measured 77 cm.
In 1982, we also carried out some observations onboard a trawler, of which the results are given in table 12. Here it is apparent that 25% of the catch was made up of P. mediterraneus, and 15% of seabreams NEI (Sparus, Dentex). Highest catches were made in statistical division 34.1.3, where the P. mediterraneus catch was 10 x that of division 34.1.3 and those of seabreams more than 3x. Length frequencies for P. mediterraneus are given by division in table 13 and figure 8. Fish in the length range of 30–40 cm were most abundant in division 34.1.3 and 34.3.1 those of 33–34 and 39–43 cm.
During this same trip Sparus caeruleostictus was also sampled. For this species, the catch was almost 3x higher in statistical division 34.1.3 than 34.3.1. Length frequencies (figure 9) show that the length classes of 30–31 to 36–37 were most numerous in 34.1.3, and 34.3.1 those of 40–45 cm. The following table summarises catches per unit of effort by statistical divisions (kg/hour):
34.1.3 | 34.3.1 | TOTAL | |
---|---|---|---|
Plectorhynchus mediterraneus | 129 | 70 | 79.6 |
Sparus caeruleostictus | 85 | 40 | 51.0 |
The length-wight relationship for P. mediterraneus is W = 1.02 13.12 A preliminary age-length key is given in table 15.
5. FURTHER STUDIES
It is intended to carry out more investigations on landings of hakes in fishing ports and to improve the collection of statistics by gear and statistical division, not only for the species mentioned, but also for other important species in the trawl and artisanal catches. Further trips on commercial vessels are also foreseen, in order to obtain more reliable data on the main species caught in the area.
TABLE 1
MAIN CATCHES BY PORTUCUESE TRAWL FLEET IN CECAF AREA
1980 – 1681 – 1982 – 1983
Divisions 34.1.1, 34.1.3, 34.3.1, 34.1.2
Fishes (SELACHII) | Years | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientifio names | C. names English | C. mames Portuguese | 1980 | 1981 | 1982 |
Squlidas | Dogfish sharks nei | Galkados a afins nep | 291 | 512 | 377 |
Rajiforaes-Hypotremata | Skates and rays nei | Raies a afins nep | 28 | 32 | 61 |
Rajiformes-Hypotremata | Skates and rays nei | Raias e afins nep | 28 | 32 | 61 |
Fishes (OSTEICHTHYES) | |||||
Sardinella pp. | Sardinelas nei | Sardinelas nep | 78 | 22 | 44 |
Congridae | Congersela nei | Congres (Safios) a afins nep | 70 | 26 | 38 |
Merluccious merkuccious | European hake | Pesceda branca | 844 | 71 | 99 |
Ferluccius senegtalensis | Senegalese hake | Pesceda branca | 844 | 71 | 99 |
Merluccius spp. | Total hakes | Total pescadas | 1767 | 135 | 198 |
Trisopterus luscus | Pouting | Faneca | - | - | 7 |
Phycis spp. | Forkboards nei | Abróteas nep | 97 | 23 | 20 |
Zeus faher | Atlantic John dory | Cale megro | 66 | 59 | 57 |
Epinepnelus spp. | GTroupers nei | Gareupas e meros nep | 696 | 935 | 354 |
Sarrabidae | Seabasses, scaperches nei | Cherne, robalos cap | 10 | 10 | 17 |
Pematous saltator | Bluefish | Ancheva | 17 | 34 | 37 |
Carangidae | Carangids nei | Carangideos nep | 727 | 543 | 1829 |
Brama brama | Atlantic pomfret | Xapeta | 13 | - | - |
Pomadanyidae | Grunte (Grunters) nei | Roncodores e Pombos nep(1) | 364 | 321 | 293 |
Scianeidae | Keagre, croakers, drums nei | Corrinas a afins nep | 716 | 1149 | 851 |
Mullidae | Surmullets nei | Salmnetes nep | 16 | 20 | 17 |
Sparus spp./Dentex spp.(1) | “Pargo” Breams nei(1) | Pargos(1) a capatñes nep | 3826 | 4622 | 2979 |
Boops boops | Bogue | Boga do mar | 79 | 91 | 84 |
Dentex spp. | Dentex nei | Cachmchoc nep | 491 | 54 | 248 |
Diplodus spp./Lithognathus mormyzus | Seabreams nei | Sarges, safia nep | 407 | - | 375 |
Pagollus spp. | Pandoras nei | Bices nep | 23 | 29 | 172 |
Spondyliosoma cantharus | Black bream | Choupa | 292 | 183 | 79 |
Sparidae | Total Seabreams | Total Esparfdeos | 5118 | 4979 | 3937 |
Ancanthuridae | Surgeonfishes nei | Unhas nep | 8 | 10 | 3 |
Lepidopus caudatus | Silver scabbardfish | Peines espada | 1170 | 1164 | 1590 |
Scomberoidei | Mackerel-Like fishes nei | Escombrídeos e afins nep | 30 | 48 | 57 |
Scomcer (phoumatophorus) japonicus | Chub mackerel | Cavala | 1323 | 1077 | 1275 |
Thunnidae | Tuna-Like fishes nei | Atune a afins nep | 261 | 530 | 967 |
Serda esrda | Atlantic bonito | Sarranjfo | 102 | 361 | - |
Stromateidae | Butterfishes, harvestfishes nei | Pompas a afins nep | 4 | 4 | 19 |
Sphyraena spp. | Barracudas nei | Bicudas nep | 8 | 6 | 2 |
Mugilidae | Mullets nei | Taínbas nep | 10 | 5 | 5 |
Scorpaenidae | Scorpionfishes nei | Cantarilhos e rescassos nep | 493 | 15 | 14 |
Triglidae | Curnards nei | Cantarilhos e rascassos nep | - | - | 42 |
Pleurnectiformes | Flatfishes (tongue seles)nei | Peixes chatos nep | 1 | 2 | 1 |
Solna vulgaris vulgaris | Common sole | Lingado legftimo | 10 | 9 | 3 |
Cynoglussidae | Tonguefishes (Tongue soles) nei | Tamberis nep | 239 | 143 | 59 |
Lophiidae | Anglerfishes nei | Tamberis nep | 59 | 5 | 7 |
Other fishes | Cutres peixes | 1355 | 399 | 232 | |
Total fishes | Total de peixes | 15147 | 12580 | 12423 | |
Mollusca | Molluscs | Molusces | |||
Sepia spp. | Cuttlefishes nei | Chocus nep | 65 | 119 | 47 |
Loliginidae/Commas trephidae | Squids nei | Lulas a Potras nep | 308 | 32 | 12 |
Octopodidae | Octopuses nei | Polves nep | 1 | 62 | 5 |
Other molluscs | Outres moluscos | 42 | 7 | 5 | |
Total molluscs | Total de moluscs | 416 | 220 | 69 | |
Crustacea | Crutaceaa | Crusticeos | |||
Palinurus spp. | Palimurid spiny lobaters nei | Lagostas nep | - | 1 | 1 |
Other cruntneans | Outrne crustá ceos | 101 | 7 | 1 | |
Total crustaceans | Total de crustáceos | 101 | 8 | 2 | |
Total geral | Total geral | 15664 | 12808 | 12494 |
(1) In this firuges are included the landings fo Rubberlip grunt (Flectorhinchus moditerraneus)
TABLE 2
PORTUGUESE TRAWL FISHERY IN CECAF AREA (FAO -34) 1975 – 1982
MAIN “SPECIES” LANDED (TONS) AND FISHING EFFORT
SPECIES | Years | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1975 | 1976 | 1977 | 1978 | 1979 | 1980 | 1981 | 1982 | |||
Merluescius spp. | Pescadas | Hakes | 3982 | 4701 | 856 | 364 | 523 | 1767 | 135 | 198 |
Epinephelus spp. | Garoupas e meros | Groupers | - | 592 | - | 750 | - | 696 | 935 | 354 |
Pomadanys spp. | Roncadores Grunts | Grunts | 407 | 503 | - | 263 | - | 364 | 321 | 293 |
Pletorhinchus mediterraneus | Pombo (Pargo mulato) | Rubberlip grunt | 3018 | 2833 | 2637 | 1501 | 3471 | 1738 | 1867 | 1810 |
Sciaenidae | Corvinas, rabetas, rainhas | Moagres | 87 | 101 | 675 | 375 | 421 | 716 | 1149 | 851 |
Sparus spp. e Dentex spp. | Pargos e capatões | Sebreams | 3018 | 2833 | 2638 | 1500 | 3468 | 2088 | 2755 | 1169 |
Dentex spp. | Cachuchos | Pargo breams nei | 1273 | 1165 | 1032 | 891 | 114 | 491 | 54 | 248 |
Diplosus spp. | Sargos e safias | Breams | 246 | - | 300 | - | 407 | - | 375 | |
Pagelpus spp. | Bicas | Pandoras | - | 23 | 29 | 172 | ||||
Spondyliosoma canthaurs | Choupa | Black seabream | 375 | 292 | 83 | 79 | ||||
TOTAL SPARIDAE | 4291 | 4244 | 3670 | 3066 | 3582 | 3301 | 2921 | 2043 | ||
OUTROS PEIXES | OTHER FISHES | 8894 | 15957 | 4932 | 2089 | 5830 | 6565 | 5252 | 6874 | |
TOTAL PEIXES | TOTAL FISHES | 20679 | 28931 | 12770 | 8408 | 13827 | 15147 | 12580 | 12423 | |
Sepia spp. | Chocos | Cuttle fishes | 65 | 119 | 47 | |||||
Loliginidae | Luas | Squids | 308 | 32 | 12 | |||||
Octopus spp. Ommastrephidae | Polvos e Potras | Octopus, Flying squids | 1 | 62 | 5 | |||||
Outos Moluscos | Other Molluscs | 42 | 7 | 5 | ||||||
TOTAL MOLLUSCA | 300 | 152 | - | 116 | 119 | 416 | 220 | 69 | ||
Palinerus spp. | Lagostas nep | Lobsters nei | 1 | 1 | ||||||
Outros Crustáceos | Other Crustaceans | 101 | 7 | 1 | ||||||
Total Crustáceos | Total Crustaceans | 101 | 8 | 2 | ||||||
TOTAL GERAL (TONS) | 20979 | 29083 | 12770 | 8524 | 13946 | 15664 | 12808 | 12494 | ||
Esforço | Effort | |||||||||
Dias de pesca | Fishing days | 4486 | 4532 | 2701 | 1643 | 2590 | 2589 | 1456 | 902* | |
Horas de pesca | Fishing hours | 78200 | 80500 | 48622 | 29565 | 46596 | 46220 | 26336 | 26622* | |
Rendimento Kg/h | Yield Kg/h | 268.3 | 361.3 | 262.6 | 288.3 | 299.3 | 338.9 | 486.3 | 469.3 |
TABLE. 3
PORTUCUESE TRAWL FISHERY IN CECAF AREA 1981, 1982, 1983
Hake landings (Merluccius spp.), 2 Cm. classes - %
1981 | 1982 | 1983 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cm | TOTAL | TOTAL | TOTAL | |||
landed | % | landed | % | landed | % | |
21 | 152 | 1.0 | 198 | 0.7 | ||
23 | 1350 | 5.4 | 884 | 2.9 | ||
25 | 6024 | 24.2 | 9826 | 32.3 | ||
27 | 9180 | 36.9 | 27236 | 89.4 | ||
29 | 3763 | 15.1 | 26359 | 86.6 | ||
31 | 1839 | 7.4 | 18986 | 62.4 | 1977 | 6.2 |
33 | 7223 | 29.0 | 13888 | 45.7 | 5930 | 18.6 |
35 | 25043 | 100.7 | 10077 | 33.1 | 11861 | 37.3 |
37 | 29211 | 117.4 | 19296 | 63.4 | 49419 | 155.3 |
39 | 33058 | 132.9 | 20483 | 67.3 | 71163 | 223.6 |
41 | 32518 | 130.7 | 23378 | 76.8 | 49419 | 155.3 |
43 | 32653 | 131.3 | 27685 | 91.0 | 49419 | 155.3 |
45 | 29768 | 119.7 | 30982 | 101.7 | 21744 | 68.3 |
47 | 24908 | 100.1 | 23537 | 77.3 | 17791 | 55.9 |
49 | 8792 | 35.3 | 12121 | 39.8 | 19768 | 62.1 |
51 | 2160 | 8.7 | 11356 | 37.3 | 11861 | 37.3 |
53 | 1080 | 4.3 | 10565 | 34.7 | 3954 | 12.4 |
55 | 5085 | 16.7 | - | - | ||
57 | 2915 | 9.6 | 3954 | 12.4 | ||
59 | 1734 | 5.7 | ||||
61 | 2882 | 9.5 | ||||
63 | 409 | 1.3 | ||||
65 | 2790 | 9.2 | ||||
67 | 633 | 2.1 | ||||
69 | 791 | 2.6 | ||||
71 | 409 | 1.3 | ||||
№ | 248722 | 304505 | 318260 | |||
W (Ton) | 135 | 198 | 172 | |||
(cm) | 39.9 | 39.8 | 42.4 | |||
(kg) | 0,543 | 0,651 | 0,541 |
Table 4
PORTUGUESE TRAWL FISHERY IN CECAF AREA
1975 – 1983
Total and hake fishery and fishing effort
Year | Fishery (Tons.) | Fishing effort | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
TOTAL | HAKES | % | Days fishing | Hours fishing | |
1975 | 20979 | 3982 | 18.9 | 4486 | 78200 |
1976 | 29083 | 4701 | 16.2 | 4532 | 80500 |
1977 | 12770 | 856 | 6.7 | 2701 | 48622 |
1978 | 8524 | 364 | 4.3 | 1643 | 29565 |
1979 | 13946 | 523 | 3.8 | 2590 | 46596 |
1980 | 15664 | 1767 | 11.3 | 2589 | 46220 |
1981 | 12808 | 135 | 1.1 | 1456 | 26336* |
1982 | 12494 | 198 | 1.6 | 1447 | 26622* |
1983 | 12615 | 172 | 1.4 | 3402 | 63220* |
Table 5
PORTUGUESS FISHERY IN CECAF AREA 1982
Artisanal fishery (line and gill nets)
Length composition of hakes landed by “artisanal” boats Sampling at fishing port (№of fishes and %)
Line | Gill nets | Total | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total length | sampled | % | sampled | % | sampled | % |
(cm) | 300 kg | 82114 kg | 82314 kg | |||
cm | ||||||
27 | 96 | 1.0 | 96 | 1.0 | ||
29 | 48 | 0.5 | 48 | 0.5 | ||
31 | 48 | 0.5 | 48 | 0.5 | ||
33 | 48 | 0.5 | 48 | 0.5 | ||
35 | 799 | 8.2 | 799 | 8.2 | ||
37 | 8 | 25.8 | 1935 | 19.9 | 1943 | 19.9 |
39 | 5 | 16.1 | 2629 | 27.0 | 2634 | 27.0 |
41 | 3 | 9.7 | 6794 | 69.7 | 6797 | 69.5 |
43 | 18 | 58.1 | 8517 | 87.4 | 8535 | 87.3 |
45 | 20 | 64.5 | 12236 | 125.6 | 12256 | 125.4 |
47 | 23 | 74.2 | 14272 | 146.5 | 14295 | 146.3 |
49 | 30 | 96.8 | 13678 | 140.4 | 13708 | 140.3 |
51 | 51 | 164.5 | 10036 | 103.0 | 10087 | 103.2 |
53 | 47 | 151.6 | 6615 | 67.9 | 6662 | 68.2 |
55 | 23 | 74.2 | 5142 | 52.8 | 5165 | 52.8 |
57 | 20 | 64.5 | 3574 | 36.7 | 3594 | 36.8 |
59 | 12 | 38.7 | 2039 | 20.9 | 2051 | 21.0 |
61 | 13 | 41.9 | 2725 | 28.0 | 2738 | 28.0 |
63 | 10 | 32.3 | 1844 | 18.9 | 1854 | 19.0 |
65 | 8 | 25.8 | 1319 | 13.5 | 1327 | 13.6 |
67 | 8 | 25.8 | 1314 | 13.5 | 1322 | 13.5 |
69 | 3 | 9.7 | 1047 | 10.7 | 1050 | 10.7 |
71 | 5 | 16.1 | 577 | 5.9 | 582 | 6.0 |
73 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
75 | - | - | 44 | 0.5 | 44 | 0.5 |
77 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
79 | 3 | 9.7 | - | - | 3 | 0.03 |
81 | - | - | - | - | ||
83 | 44 | 0.5 | 44 | 0.5 | ||
85 | ||||||
Total | 310 | 97420 | 97730 |
Table 6
PORTUGUESS HAKE FISHERY IN CECAF AREA 1981
Length composition of landings
Line fishery - A part of the total landings (sampling)
Trawl fishey - Total landed
Line | Trawl | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cm | Sampling | Total landed | ||
No | % | № | % | |
21 | 152 | 1.0 | ||
3 | 1350 | 5.4 | ||
5 | 6024 | 24.2 | ||
7 | 9180 | 36.9 | ||
9 | 3763 | 15.1 | ||
31 | 1839 | 7.4 | ||
3 | 13 | 0.6 | 7223 | 29.0 |
5 | 47 | 2.2 | 25043 | 100.7 |
7 | 54 | 2.5 | 29211 | 117.4 |
9 | 203 | 9.5 | 33058 | 132.9 |
41 | 418 | 19.6 | 33518 | 130.7 |
3 | 877 | 41.0 | 32653 | 131.3 |
5 | 1369 | 64.0 | 29768 | 119.7 |
7 | 1884 | 88.1 | 24908 | 100.1 |
9 | 2628 | 122.9 | 8792 | 35.3 |
51 | 2236 | 104.6 | 2160 | 8.7 |
3 | 1478 | 69.1 | 1080 | 4.3 |
5 | 996 | 46.6 | ||
7 | 1909 | 89.3 | ||
9 | 611 | 28.6 | ||
61 | 756 | 35.4 | ||
3 | 935 | 43.7 | ||
5 | 947 | 44.3 | ||
7 | 1004 | 47.0 | ||
9 | 1087 | 50.8 | ||
71 | 447 | 20.9 | ||
3 | 461 | 21.6 | ||
5 | 66 | 3.1 | ||
7 | 187 | 8.7 | ||
9 | 91 | 4.3 | ||
81 | 9 | 0.4 | ||
3 | 9 | 0.4 | ||
5 | - | - | ||
7 | 69 | 3.2 | ||
9 | 43 | 2.0 | ||
91 | 6 | 0.3 | ||
3 | 2 | 0.1 | ||
5 | - | - | ||
7 | 138 | 6.5 | ||
9 | 49 | 2.3 | ||
101 | 131 | 6.1 | ||
3 | - | - | ||
5 | - | - | ||
7 | 176 | 8.2 | ||
9 | - | - | ||
111 | 43 | 2.0 | ||
№ | 21379 | 248722 | ||
W (Kg) | 29732 | 135135 | ||
(Cm) | 56.4 | 39.9 | ||
(Kg) | 1.4 | 0.54 |
Table.7
PORTUGUESE GILL NET FISHERY IN CECAF AREA - 1982
Observations carried out on board a commercial ship - Div. 3.1
Hake catches (M. merluccius; M. semegalensis (mainly) %
M. senegalensis | M.merluccius | TOTAL | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cm | № | % | № | % | № | % |
27 | 4 | 0.05 | 3 | 0.04 | 7 | 0.09 |
29 | 4 | 0.05 | - | - | 4 | 0.05 |
31 | 11 | 0.1 | - | - | 11 | 0.1 |
33 | 4 | 0.05 | - | - | 4 | 0.05 |
35 | 15 | 0.2 | 9 | 0.1 | 24 | 0.3 |
37 | 153 | 2.0 | 30 | 0.3 | 183 | 2.3 |
39 | 361 | 4.5 | 191 | 2.5 | 552 | 7.2 |
41 | 681 | 8.9 | 385 | 5.0 | 1066 | 13.9 |
43 | 906 | 11.8 | 530 | 6.9 | 1436 | 18.7 |
45 | 949 | 12.3 | 514 | 6.7 | 1463 | 19.0 |
47 | 674 | 8.8 | 422 | 5.5 | 1096 | 14.3 |
49 | 448 | 5.8 | 287 | 3.7 | 735 | 9.5 |
51 | 251 | 3.3 | 169 | 2.2 | 420 | 5.5 |
53 | 135 | 1.8 | 101 | 1.3 | 236 | 3.1 |
55 | 84 | 1.1 | 65 | 0.9 | 149 | 2.0 |
57 | 58 | 0.8 | 33 | 0.4 | 91 | 1.2 |
59 | 36 | 0.5 | 46 | 0.6 | 82 | 1.1 |
61 | 26 | 0.3 | 21 | 0.3 | 47 | 0.6 |
63 | - | 18 | 0.2 | 18 | 0.2 | |
65 | - | 12 | 0.2 | 12 | 0.2 | |
67 | 4 | 21 | 0.3 | 25 | 0.4 | |
69 | 6 | 0.07 | 6 | 0.07 | ||
71 | 3 | 0.04 | 3 | 0.04 | ||
73 | 9 | 0.1 | 9 | 0.1 | ||
75 | 12 | 0.2 | 12 | 0.2 | ||
N0 | 480 | 2887 | 7691 | |||
W (Kg) | 3395 | 2630 | 6025 | |||
(Cm) | 44.9 | 46.2 | 45.6 | |||
(Kg) | 0.7 | 0.9 | 0.7 |
TABLE: 8
PORTUGUESE STUDIES IN CECAF AREA 1982
Hake - Merluccius merluccius - Stages of maturity (Z)
FEMEAS | MACHOS | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEMALES | MALES | ||||||||||||||
ESTADOS DE MATURAÇAO | ESTADOS DE MATURAÇAO | Total | |||||||||||||
Stages of maturity | Stages of maturity | Ceral | |||||||||||||
% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Total | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Total | % |
Cl. comp. | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | % | |
39 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 1.0 | ||||||||||||
40 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 100.0 | 7.7 | 100.0 | 7.9 | 3.8 | ||||||||
1 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 50.0 | 33.3 | 7.7 | 7.7 | 15.8 | 6.7 | |||||||
2 | 2.8 | 14.3 | 3.0 | 33.3 | 7.7 | 7.9 | 4.8 | ||||||||
3 | 11.1 | 33.3 | 10.6 | 23.1 | 23.1 | 15.8 | 12.5 | ||||||||
4 | 5.6 | 7.1 | 14.3 | 6.1 | 50.0 | 15.4 | 15.4 | 15.8 | 9.6 | ||||||
5 | 2.8 | 35.7 | 9.1 | 15.4 | 15.4 | 10.5 | 9.6 | ||||||||
6 | 8.3 | 21.4 | 22.2 | 12.1 | 16.7 | 7.7 | 7.7 | 7.9 | 10.6 | ||||||
7 | 11.1 | 6.1 | 16.7 | 30.8 | 13.2 | 8.7 | |||||||||
8 | 8.3 | 21.4 | 9.1 | 7.7 | 2.6 | 6.7 | |||||||||
9 | 5.6 | 3.0 | 1.9 | ||||||||||||
50 | 11.1 | 7.1 | 11.1 | 9.1 | 5.8 | ||||||||||
1 | 5.6 | 14.3 | 4.5 | 2.9 | |||||||||||
2 | 5.6 | 11.1 | 4.5 | 7.7 | 2.6 | 3.8 | |||||||||
3 | 22.2 | 28.6 | 6.1 | 3.8 | |||||||||||
4 | 7.1 | 1.5 | 1.0 | ||||||||||||
5 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 1.0 | ||||||||||||
6 | 5.6 | 3.0 | 1.9 | ||||||||||||
7 | - | - | |||||||||||||
8 | 2.8 | 14.3 | 3.0 | 1.9 | |||||||||||
9 | 2.8 | 1.5 | 1.0 | ||||||||||||
60 | |||||||||||||||
1 | |||||||||||||||
2 | |||||||||||||||
3 | |||||||||||||||
4 | |||||||||||||||
5 | |||||||||||||||
6 | |||||||||||||||
7 | |||||||||||||||
8 | |||||||||||||||
9 | |||||||||||||||
70 | |||||||||||||||
71 | 14.3 | 1.5 | 1.0 | ||||||||||||
No of | 0 | 36 | 14 | 0 | 9 | 7 | 66 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 38 | 104 |
Fishes | |||||||||||||||
- | 54.5 | 21.2 | - | 13.6 | 10.6 | 2.6 | 10.5 | 15.8 | 34.2 | 34.2 | 2.6 |
Scale of maturity
1 - Imature; 2 - Developing; 3 - Pre-spawning; 4 - Spawning; 5 - Post-spawning; 6 - Recovering
Table 9
PORTUGUESE TRAWL FISHERY IN CECAN AREA - 1981, 1987, 1983
Length compositions (landings) of Rubberlip grunt (Plecterhinchus mediterraneus), № of fish and %
1981 | 1982 | 1983 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLASSES | ||||||||||
% | ||||||||||
1 cm | 2 cm | % | 1 cm | 2 cm | % | 1 cm | 2 cm | (1 cm) | (2 cm) | |
19 | 83 | 83 | 0.004 | |||||||
20 | - | |||||||||
1 | 414 | 414 | 0.2 | 242 | 242 | 0.01 | ||||
2 | 551 | 852 | ||||||||
3 | 2187 | 2738 | 1.3 | 3392 | 4244 | 2.1 | ||||
4 | 2789 | 4240 | 353 | 0.2 | ||||||
5 | 9436 | 12225 | 5.8 | 10318 | 14558 | 7.1 | - | 353 | - | 0.2 |
6 | 20584 | 20614 | 2086 | 1.2 | ||||||
7 | 39529 | 60113 | 28.7 | 55666 | 76280 | 37.3 | 1541 | 3627 | 0.9 | 2.1 |
8 | 53203 | - | 83461 | 5311 | 3.1 | |||||
9 | 64436 | 117639 | 56.1 | 108026 | 191487 | 93.6 | 7464 | 12775 | 4.3 | 7.4 |
30 | 64570 | 120233 | 10336 | 6.0 | ||||||
1 | 72070 | 136640 | 65.2 | 141845 | 2362078 | 128.1 | 11340 | 21676 | 6.6 | 12.6 |
2 | 67533 | 142716 | 14769 | 8.6 | ||||||
3 | 77422 | 144955 | 69.1 | 126590 | 269306 | 131.7 | 20371 | 35140 | 11.8 | 20.4 |
4 | 99762 | 132541 | 24201 | 14.0 | ||||||
5 | 118179 | 217941 | 104.0 | 130513 | 263054 | 128.6 | 27802 | 52003 | 16.1 | 30.1 |
6 | 143398 | 135214 | 42052 | 24.4 | ||||||
7 | 160760 | 304158 | 145.1 | 140110 | 275324 | 134.6 | 67035 | 109037 | 38.8 | 63.2 |
8 | 143344 | 131384 | 52213 | 30.3 | ||||||
9 | 130992 | 274336 | 130.8 | 121123 | 252507 | 123.4 | 76028 | 128241 | 44.1 | 74.3 |
40 | 105940 | 96265 | 106782 | 61.9 | ||||||
1 | 83305 | 89245 | 90.3 | 85229 | 181494 | 88.7 | 133484 | 240266 | 77.4 | 139.2 |
2 | 76458 | 53387 | 130032 | 75.4 | ||||||
3 | 66410 | 142868 | 68.1 | 36721 | 90108 | 44.1 | 151208 | 281240 | 87.6 | 163.0 |
4 | 61128 | 34340 | 160723 | 93.1 | ||||||
5 | 60015 | 121143 | 57.8 | 22032 | 56372 | 27.6 | 115653 | 276376 | 67.0 | 160.2 |
6 | 48916 | 25138 | 98869 | 57.3 | ||||||
7 | 50846 | 99762 | 47.6 | 11170 | 36308 | 17.8 | 103822 | 202711 | 60.2 | 117.5 |
8 | 42801 | 9695 | 70731 | 41.0 | ||||||
9 | 39723 | 82524 | 39.4 | 9679 | 19374 | 9.5 | 59954 | 130685 | 34.7 | 75.7 |
50 | 26059 | 7651 | 49036 | 28.4 | ||||||
1 | 24342 | 50401 | 24.0 | 8144 | 15795 | 7.7 | 43499 | 92535 | 25.2 | 53.6 |
2 | 17783 | 8907 | 32147 | 18.6 | ||||||
3 | 17697 | 35480 | 17.0 | 8821 | 17728 | 8.7 | 19997 | 52144 | 11.6 | 30.2 |
4 | 13273 | 7483 | 14058 | 8.1 | ||||||
5 | 12578 | 25851 | 12.3 | 4631 | 12114 | 5.9 | 16148 | 30206 | 3.4 | 17.5 |
6 | 8142 | 1771 | 9010 | 5.2 | ||||||
7 | 7754 | 15896 | 7.6 | 2314 | 4085 | 2.0 | 10579 | 19589 | 6.1 | 11.4 |
8 | 7158 | \?\ | 7492 | 4.3 | ||||||
9 | 7073 | 14221 | 6.8 | 818 | 1567 | 0.8 | 4285 | 11777 | 2.5 | 6.8 |
60 | 5845 | 451 | 5611 | 3.3 | ||||||
1 | 5993 | 11838 | 5.6 | 280 | 731 | 0.4 | 1825 | 7436 | 1.1 | 4.3 |
2 | 6515 | 318 | 1742 | 1.0 | ||||||
3 | 6569 | 13084 | 6.2 | - | 318 | 0.2 | 6781 | 8523 | 3.9 | 4.9 |
4 | 3591 | 318 | 1121 | 0.6 | ||||||
5 | 4065 | 7656 | 3.7 | 318 | 0.2 | 2316 | 3437 | 1.3 | 1.9 | |
6 | 5589 | 1177 | 0.7 | |||||||
7 | 2692 | 8381 | 4.0 | 629 | 1806 | 0.4 | 1.0 | |||
8 | 2435 | 2307 | 1.3 | |||||||
9 | 2028 | 4463 | 2.1 | 780 | 3037 | 0.5 | 1.8 | |||
70 | 1237 | 565 | 0.3 | |||||||
1 | 687 | 1924 | 0.9 | 376 | 941 | 0.2 | 0.5 | |||
2 | 661 | |||||||||
3 | 96 | 757 | 0.4 | |||||||
4 | 12 | |||||||||
5 | 31 | 43 | 0.0 | |||||||
6 | - | |||||||||
7 | 16 | 16 | 0.0 | |||||||
8 | ||||||||||
9 | ||||||||||
80 | ||||||||||
№ | 2096622 | 2045475 | 1725661 | |||||||
W(Tons.) | 1567 | 1810 | 2005 | |||||||
Y | 39.5 | 36.7 | 44.1 | |||||||
(Kg) | 0.9 | 0.9 | 1.2 |
TABLE:10
PORTUGUESE STUDIES IN CECAF AREA 1981, 1982
Length compositions of Rubberlip grunt (Plectorhiachus mediterraneus) Sampling on fishing port (№of fishes and % from ships sampled (Gill nets landings)
1981 | 1982 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cm | № of | № of | ||
fishes | % | fishes | % | |
21 | ||||
3 | 646 | 1.1 | ||
5 | 1032 | 1.9 | ||
7 | 2572 | 4.4 | 565 | 1.0 |
9 | 7813 | 8.3 | 643 | 1.2 |
31 | 5182 | 9.0 | 1795 | 3.2 |
3 | 8829 | 15.2 | 3545 | 6.4 |
5 | 17898 | 30.9 | 4417 | 8.0 |
7 | 25554 | 44.1 | 11368 | 20.5 |
9 | 33512 | 57.8 | 28675 | 51.8 |
41 | 43475 | 75.0 | 77527 | 139.9 |
3 | 66802 | 115.3 | 96216 | 173.7 |
5 | 76010 | 131.2 | 91130 | 164.5 |
7 | 70945 | 122.5 | 67594 | 122.1 |
9 | 62930 | 108.6 | 47436 | 85.6 |
51 | 41532 | 71.7 | 34129 | 61.6 |
3 | 28574 | 49.3 | 26789 | 48.4 |
5 | 20825 | 36.0 | 16206 | 29.3 |
7 | 13239 | 22.9 | 13079 | 23.6 |
9 | 12140 | 21.0 | 8738 | 15.8 |
61 | 10222 | 17.7 | 6416 | 11.6 |
3 | 11712 | 20.2 | 4439 | 8.0 |
5 | 6809 | 11.8 | 3122 | 5.6 |
7 | 7478 | 12.9 | 4219 | 7.6 |
9 | 4030 | 7.0 | 2740 | 4.9 |
71 | 1737 | 3.0 | 1638 | 3.0 |
3 | 684 | 1.2 | 606 | 1.1 |
5 | 39 | 0.1 | 588 | 1.1 |
77 | 14 | 395 | 0.7 | |
№ | 579285 | 554015 | ||
W(kg) | 691559 | 792598 | ||
I(Cm) | 46.8 | 46.4 | ||
(Kg) | 1.2 | 1.4 |
Table: 11
PORTUCESE STUDIES IN CECAF AREA 1932
Long compositions of Rubborlip grant (Plectorhiachus mediterraneus) - gill zeta landings
Sampling on fishing port (№ of fishes and %)
1% Trimestra | 2% Trimestro | 3% Trimestro | 4% Trimestro | TOTAL | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
cm | 1 cm | 2 cm | % | 1 cm | 2 cm | % | 1 cm | 2 cm | % | 1 cm | 2 cm | % | 1 cm | 2 cm | % |
25 | 169 | 168 | |||||||||||||
27 | 152 | 320 | 1.4 | 45 | 45 | 0.4 | 200 | 200 | 1.8 | 397 | 565 | 1.0 | |||
28 | - | - | 239 | 239 | |||||||||||
29 | 192 | 192 | 0.9 | - | 212 | 451 | 4.1 | 404 | 643 | 1.2 | |||||
30 | 313 | - | 761 | 1074 | |||||||||||
31 | 254 | 567 | 2.6 | 45 | 45 | 0.4 | 422 | 1183 | 10.8 | 721 | 1795 | 3.2 | |||
32 | 365 | 45 | 656 | 1036 | |||||||||||
33 | 795 | 1180 | 5.3 | 383 | 428 | 3.8 | 1281 | 1937 | 17.8 | 2459 | 3545 | 6.4 | |||
34 | 652 | 410 | 1026 | 2120 | |||||||||||
35 | 1194 | 1876 | 8.4 | 241 | 241 | 2.2 | 106 | 516 | 4.6 | 736 | 1784 | 16.4 | 2297 | 4417 | 8.0 |
36 | 1470 | 443 | 1213 | 1090 | 4216 | ||||||||||
37 | 2292 | 3762 | 16.9 | 797 | 1240 | 11.2 | 806 | 2019 | 18.0 | 3257 | 4347 | 39.9 | 7152 | 11368 | 20.5 |
38 | 2113 | 2130 | 1974 | 4475 | 10742 | ||||||||||
39 | 5622 | 7735 | 34.8 | 1902 | 4082 | 36.9 | 3334 | 5308 | 47.4 | 7075 | 11550 | 105.9 | 17933 | 28675 | 51.8 |
40 | 10356 | 4911 | 7899 | 7803 | 30969 | ||||||||||
41 | 13195 | 23551 | 105.9 | 10759 | 15670 | 141.7 | 12539 | 19435 | 173.7 | 11035 | 18868 | 173.0 | 46558 | 77527 | 139.9 |
42 | 13535 | 11731 | 11486 | 12011 | 48313 | ||||||||||
43 | 16563 | 30098 | 135.3 | 8802 | 20583 | 186.1 | 11937 | 23423 | 209.3 | 10101 | 22112 | 202.7 | 47403 | 96216 | 173.7 |
44 | 17545 | 11299 | 11954 | 94.4 | 50202 | ||||||||||
45 | 13506 | 31051 | 139.6 | 9726 | 21025 | 190.1 | 9432 | 21386 | 191.1 | 8264 | 17668 | 162.0 | 40928 | 91130 | 164.5 |
46 | 14089 | 6454 | 9192 | 4789 | 34524 | ||||||||||
47 | 11934 | 25.23 | 117.0 | 9666 | 16120 | 145.8 | 7089 | 16281 | 145.4 | 4381 | 9170 | 84.1 | 33070 | 67594 | 122.1 |
48 | 10474 | 6361 | 3358 | 4847 | 25040 | ||||||||||
49 | 11350 | 21824 | 98.1 | 5167 | 11528 | 104.3 | 3350 | 6708 | 59.9 | 2529 | 7376 | 67.6 | 22396 | 47436 | 85.6 |
50 | 10070 | 2602 | 2787 | 2199 | 17658 | ||||||||||
51 | 9414 | 19281 | 87.6 | 3280 | 5882 | 53.2 | 2553 | 5340 | 47.7 | 1224 | 3423 | 31.4 | 16471 | 34129 | 61.6 |
52 | 9764 | 1261 | 2072 | 1967 | 15064 | ||||||||||
53 | 7832 | 17596 | 79.1 | 1622 | 2883 | 26.1 | 1445 | 3517 | 31.4 | 826 | 2793 | 25.6 | 11725 | 26789 | 48.4 |
54 | 5310 | 477 | 652 | 1089 | 8028 | ||||||||||
55 | 4780 | 10530 | 47.3 | 1418 | 1895 | 17.1 | 635 | 1287 | 11.5 | 1405 | 2494 | 22.9 | 8178 | 16206 | 29.3 |
56 | 4519 | 585 | 926 | 621 | 6651 | ||||||||||
57 | 3872 | 8391 | 37.7 | 1103 | 1688 | 15.3 | 756 | 1682 | 15.0 | 697 | 1318 | 12.1 | 6428 | 13079 | 23.6 |
58 | 2350 | 948 | 468 | 137 | 3903 | ||||||||||
59 | 2756 | 5106 | 23.0 | 927 | 1875 | 17.0 | 364 | 832 | 7.4 | 788 | 925 | 8.5 | 4835 | 8738 | 15.8 |
60 | 1640 | 995 | 445 | 713 | 3793 | ||||||||||
61 | 1230 | 2870 | 12.9 | 377 | 1372 | 12.4 | 771 | 1216 | 10.9 | 245 | 958 | 8.8 | 2623 | 6416 | 11.6 |
62 | 939 | 539 | 79 | 140 | 1967 | ||||||||||
63 | 1916 | 2755 | 12.4 | 665 | 1204 | 10.9 | 124 | 203 | 1.8 | 137 | 277 | 2.5 | 2742 | 4439 | 8.0 |
64 | 1317 | 407 | 292 | 108 | 2124 | ||||||||||
65 | 568 | 1835 | 8.5 | 68 | 475 | 4.3 | 292 | 584 | 5.2 | 70 | 178 | 1.6 | 998 | 3122 | 5.6 |
66 | 2112 | 612 | 425 | - | 3249 | ||||||||||
67 | 480 | 2592 | 11.7 | - | 612 | 5.5 | 527 | 952 | 8.5 | 63 | 63 | 0.6 | 1070 | 4219 | 7.6 |
69 | 631 | 1001 | 247 | - | 1879 | ||||||||||
70 | 10 | 532 | 124 | 666 | |||||||||||
71 | 741 | 751 | 3.4 | 231 | 763 | 6.9 | - | 124 | 1.1 | 972 | 1638 | 3.0 | |||
72 | 85 | 369 | - | 454 | |||||||||||
73 | - | 85 | 0.4 | 369 | 3.3 | 152 | 152 | 1.4 | 152 | 606 | 1.1 | ||||
74 | 588 | 588 | |||||||||||||
75 | - | 588 | 2.6 | - | 588 | 1.1 | |||||||||
76 | 287 | 287 | |||||||||||||
77 | 108 | 395 | 108 | 103 | 395 | 0.7 | |||||||||
118 | 222416 | 1000.1 | 110576 | 1000.0 | 111938 | 999.9 | 109075 | 1000.1 | 554015 | 1000.2 | |||||
W (Kg) | 361743 | 161878 | 140069 | 128903 | 792598 | ||||||||||
I (cm) | 48.0 | 46.7 | 45.5 | 43.9 | 46.4 | ||||||||||
W (Kg) | 1.626 | 1.464 | 1.251 | 1.182 | 1.431 |
TABLE 12 - PORTUGUESE FISHERY IN THE CECAF WATERS - MAY 1982 STUDY TRIP ON BOARD A COMMERCIAL TRAWLER RESULTS OF THE FISHERY (Kg). FISHING EFFPRT AND YIELD
Fishes (SELACHII) | DIV. 34 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scientific names | C. namen(English) | C. names(Portuguese) | 1.3 | 3.1 | TOTAL |
Pleurotremata | Smooth hounds and sharks nei | Caçõcs e tubarõeu nep | 21570 | 1170 | 22740 |
Fishes (OSTHICHTHYES) | |||||
Dicentrarchus spp. | Sea bases nei | Robalos nep | 690 | 900 | 1590 |
Epinnepgelus spp. | Groupers nei | Garoupas e meron nep | 2430 | 1230 | 3660 |
Pomodasys spp. | Grunts nei | Roucadores nep | 5940 | 660 | 6600 |
Pleeiorginchus mediterraneus | Rubberlip grunt | Pombo (Pargo mulato) | 28230 | 2970 | 31200 |
Sciaenidae | Meagres, croakers, drums nei | Corvinas e afins nep | 1380 | 1620 | 3000 |
Sparas spp. e Dentex spp. | Seabreams nei | Parges e capatões nep | 5940 | 450 | 6390 |
Diplodus spp. | Breams nei | Sargos, safia nep | 5940 | 450 | 6390 |
Sprnfyliodoms vsnyhstud | Black seabream | Choupa | 30 | 720 | 750 |
Thyrsites atun | Snock | Senuca (Poguete) | 1770 | 210 | 1980 |
Psetiodes bonneiti | Spiny turbot | Palma | 810 | 180 | 990 |
Other fishes | Outros peixes | 2760 | 2280 | 5040 | |
Total fishes | Total de peixes | 86872 | 16512 | 103384 | |
Kollusca | Molluses | Molusces | |||
Sepia spp. | Cuttlefishes nei | Chocos nep | 1320 | 390 | 1710 |
Rejects | Rejeições | 17534 | 3692 | 21226 | |
Total general | Total geral | 105726 | 20594 | 126320 | |
Fishing hours | Horas de pesca | 303 | 99 | 402 | |
Yield Kg/hour | Rendimento | 349 | 208 | 322 |
TABLE 13 PORTUGUESE STUDIES IN THE C.E.C.A.F. AREA ON BOARD A COMMERCIAL TRAWLER APRIL - MAY 1982 Length composition of Rubberlip grunt (Plectorhinechus mediterraneus)
Divisions - 1.3 + 3.1 | 1.3 | 3.1 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Classes | 1cm | 2cm | % | 1cm | 2cm | % | 1cm | 2cm | % |
23 | 13 | 13 | 0.6 | 13 | 13 | 0.7 | - | - | - |
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
25 | 77 | 77 | 3.4 | 77 | 77 | 4.0 | - | - | - |
26 | 157 | - | - | 155 | - | - | 2 | - | - |
27 | 229 | 386 | 16.9 | 219 | 347 | 19.5 | 10 | 12 | 3.2 |
28 | 477 | - | - | 451 | - | - | 26 | - | - |
29 | 899 | 1376 | 60.1 | 877 | 1328 | 69.3 | 22 | 48 | 12.8 |
30 | 1130 | - | - | 1045 | - | - | 85 | - | - |
31 | 1466 | 2596 | 113.3 | 1316 | 2361 | 123.2 | 150 | 235 | 62.6 |
32 | 1372 | - | - | 1122 | - | - | 250 | - | - |
33 | 1501 | 2873 | 125.4 | 1251 | 2373 | 123.8 | 250 | 500 | 133.7 |
34 | 1495 | - | - | 1316 | - | - | 179 | - | - |
35 | 1289 | 2784 | 121.5 | 1161 | 2477 | 129.2 | 128 | 307 | 82.1 |
36 | 1579 | - | - | 1457 | - | - | 122 | - | - |
37 | 1284 | 2863 | 125.0 | 1122 | 2579 | 134.6 | 162 | 284 | 75.9 |
38 | 1411 | - | - | 1200 | - | - | 211 | - | - |
39 | 1286 | 2697 | 117.7 | 1083 | 2283 | 119.1 | 203 | 414 | 110.7 |
40 | 1025 | - | - | 735 | - | - | 290 | - | - |
41 | 1259 | 2284 | 99.7 | 967 | 1702 | 88.8 | 292 | 582 | 155.6 |
42 | 1355 | - | - | 1071 | - | - | 284 | - | - |
43 | 669 | 2024 | 88.4 | 413 | 1484 | 77.4 | 256 | 540 | 144.4 |
44 | 818 | - | - | 645 | - | - | 173 | - | - |
45 | 523 | 1341 | 58.5 | 361 | 1006 | 52.5 | 162 | 335 | 89.6 |
46 | 327 | - | - | 219 | - | - | 108 | - | - |
47 | 255 | 582 | 25.4 | 168 | 387 | 20 | 87 | 195 | 52.1 |
48 | 181 | - | - | 116 | - | - | 65 | - | - |
49 | 167 | 348 | 15.2 | 116 | 232 | 12.1 | 51 | 116 | 31.0 |
50 | 150 | - | - | 103 | - | - | 47 | - | - |
51 | 163 | 313 | 13.7 | 116 | 219 | 11.4 | 47 | 94 | 25.1 |
52 | 127 | - | - | 103 | - | - | 24 | - | - |
53 | 85 | 212 | 9.3 | 77 | 180 | 9.4 | 8 | 32 | 8.6 |
54 | 72 | - | - | 52 | - | - | 20 | - | - |
55 | 13 | 85 | 3.7 | 13 | 65 | 3.4 | - | 20 | 5.3 |
56 | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | - |
57 | 23 | 25 | 1.1 | 13 | 13 | 0.7 | 10 | 12 | 3.7 |
58 | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | - | - |
59 | 4 | 8 | 0.3 | - | - | - | 4 | 8 | 2.1 |
60 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
61 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
62 | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | - | - |
63 | - | 4 | 0.2 | - | - | - | - | 4 | 1.1 |
64 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
65 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
66 | 13 | - | - | 13 | - | - | - | - | - |
67 | - | 13 | 0.7 | - | 13 | 0.7 | - | - | - |
68 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
69 | 2 | 2 | 0.1 | - | - | - | 2 | 2 | 0.5 |
Total 22.906 | 19.166 | 3.740 | |||||||
Weigth (catches) 31.200 | (Catches)28.230 | 2.970 | |||||||
I 36.9 | 36.5 | 39.3 | |||||||
W 1.4 | 1.5 | 0.9 |
TABLE : 14 PORTUGUESE STUDIES IN CECAF AREA FAO 34 1982 Rubberlip Grunt - Plectorhincus mediterraneus
Length/Weight relationship
Length cm | No of fishes | Total Weight(N) | Log10e | Log10W | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
26 | 3 | 550 | 183 | 1.41 | 2.26 |
27 | 8 | 1800 | 225 | 1.43 | 2.35 |
28 | 14 | 3450 | 246 | 1.45 | 2.39 |
29 | 34 | 9850 | 290 | 1.46 | 2.46 |
30 | 44 | 15475 | 352 | 1.48 | 2.55 |
31 | 55 | 23050 | 419 | 1.49 | 2.62 |
32 | 76 | 35750 | 470 | 1.51 | 2.67 |
33 | 109 | 58450 | 536 | 1.57 | 2.73 |
34 | 90 | 53100 | 590 | 1.53 | 2.77 |
35 | 115 | 76200 | 663 | 1.54 | 2.82 |
36 | 116 | 84700 | 730 | 1.56 | 2.86 |
37 | 124 | 96000 | 774 | 1.57 | 2.89 |
38 | 104 | 87400 | 840 | 1.58 | 2.92 |
39 | 97 | 86300 | 890 | 1.59 | 2.95 |
40 | 97 | 91000 | 938 | 1.60 | 2.97 |
41 | 81 | 81850 | 1011 | 1.61 | 3.00 |
42 | 79 | 86160 | 1091 | 1.62 | 3.04 |
43 | 47 | 52900 | 1123 | 1.63 | 3.05 |
44 | 50 | 60450 | 1209 | 1.84 | 3.08 |
45 | 45 | 57650 | 1281 | 1.65 | 3.11 |
46 | 32 | 46550 | 1455 | 1.66 | 3.16 |
47 | 20 | 30550 | 1528 | 1.67 | 3.18 |
48 | 11 | 18450 | 1677 | 1.68 | 3.22 |
49 | 18 | 32400 | 1800 | 1.69 | 3.26 |
50 | 17 | 32000 | 1882 | 1.70 | 3.27 |
51 | 15 | 29650 | 1977 | 1.71 | 3.30 |
52 | 8 | 16450 | 2056 | 1.72 | 3.31 |
53 | 4 | 8750 | 2188 | 1.72 | 3.34 |
54 | 5 | 12000 | 2400 | 1.73 | 3.38 |
55 | - | - | - | - | - |
56 | - | - | - | - | - |
57 | 4 | 30850 | 2713 | 1.76 | 3.43 |
58 | 2 | 50 | 2550 | 1.76 | 3.41 |
59 | 2 | 5850 | 2925 | 1.77 | 3.47 |
60 | - | - | - | - | - |
61 | - | - | - | - | - |
62 | 3 | 9600 | 3700 | 1.79 | 3.51 |
69 | 2 | 7000 | 3500 | 1.84 | 3.54 |
Total | 533 | 1328,185 kg |
Table 15
Portuguese studies in CECAF AREA
Rubberlip grunt (Plectorhinchus mediterraneus) (Age/length) *
Age L(Cm) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | > 6 | TOTAL |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
21 | ||||||||
23 | ||||||||
5 | 11 | 1 | 12 | |||||
7 | 22 | 15 | 37 | |||||
9 | 12 | 50 | 3 | 65 | ||||
31 | 58 | 16 | 74 | |||||
3 | 13 | 20 | 1 | 34 | ||||
5 | 12 | 34 | 5 | 51 | ||||
7 | 24 | 21 | 45 | |||||
9 | 18 | 28 | 6 | 52 | ||||
41 | 1 | 28 | 26 | 1 | 56 | |||
3 | 18 | 33 | 11 | 62 | ||||
5 | 12 | 44 | 11 | 1 | 68 | |||
7 | 16 | 35 | 14 | 1 | 66 | |||
9 | 8 | 33 | 41 | 4 | 86 | |||
51 | 1 | 14 | 12 | 13 | 40 | |||
3 | 1 | 11 | 24 | 8 | 44 | |||
5 | 3 | 19 | 10 | 32 | ||||
7 | 13 | 7 | 20 | |||||
9 | 6 | 9 | 15 | |||||
61 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||
3 | 5 | 5 | ||||||
5 | 3 | 3 | ||||||
7 | 4 | 4 | ||||||
9 | 3 | 3 | ||||||
71 | 2 | 2 | ||||||
3 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
7 | ||||||||
№ | 45 | 149 | 116 | 139 | 205 | 153 | 71 | 878 |
% | 5.1 | 17.0 | 13.2 | 15.8 | 23.3 | 17.4 | 8.1 | 90.9 |
* Age determination by otoliths
FIG. 1 - - PORTUGUESE TRAWL FISHERY IN CECAF AREA 1981, 82, 83 Make landings (Merluccius spp.) - 2 cm classes. %
FIG. 2 - PORTUGUESE TRAWL FISHERY IN CECAF AREA 1975 –1983 Total and hakes landings and fishing effort
FIG 3 - PORTUGUESE “ARTISANAL” MAKE FISHERY IN CECAF AREA 1982 (Line and gill nets) Length composition of hakes landed by artisanal boats Sampling on fishing port, °/oo
FIG. 4 - PORTUGUESE FISHERY IN CECAF AREA - (DIV. 34.1.1 MAINLY) 1981
Hake (Merluccius spp.) line fishery - Sampling on fishing port Length composition, °/oo
FIG. 5 - PORTUGUESE GILL NET FISHERY IN CECAF AREA 1982 OBSERVATIONS CARRIED OUT ON BOARD A COMMERCIAL SHIP - Div. 34.3.1 Hake catches (M. merluccius, M. senegalensis), %
FIG. 6 - PORTUGUESE TRAWL FISHERY IN CECAF AREA - 1981, 1982, 1983 Length composition (landings) of Rubberlip grunt (Plectorhinchus mediterraneus), °/oo
FIG. 7 - PORTUGUESE STUDIES IN CECAF AREA 1982 Length composition of Rubberlip grunt (Plectorhinchus mediterraneus) Gill nets landings Sampling on fishing port (N° of fished, °/oo
FIG 8 - PORTUGUESE STUDIES IN CECAF AREA ON BOARD A TRAWLER APRIL-MAY 1982 Length composition (catches) on Rubberlip grunt - Plectorhinchus mediterraneus, °/oo
FIG 9 - PORTUGUESE STUDIES IN CECAF AREA - APRIL, MAY 1982 Observations on board a trawler in Divisions 34.1.3 and 34.3.1 Length composition of Bluespotted seabream - Sparus coeruleostictus, °/oo
FIG.10 - PORTUGUESE STUDIES IN CECAF AREA - 1982 Rubberlip grunt - Plectorhinchus mediterraneus Length/weight relationship
FIG.11 - PORTUGUESE STUDIES IN CECAF AREA - 1982 Rubberlip grunt - Plectorhinchus mediterraneus Length/weight relationship (log.)