RAB/83/016
RER/83/001
Field Document
February 1989
THE PARALIC REALM
GEOLOGICAL, BIOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC EXPRESSIONS OF CONFINEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS


Report prepared for the Mediterranean Regional Aquaculture Project

by

O. Guelorget and J.-P. Perthuisot


This report was prepared during the course of the project identified on the title page. The conclusions and recommendations given in the report are those considered appropriate at the time of its preparation. They may be modified in the light of further knowledge gained at subsequent stages of the project.

The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this document do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations or the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal or constitutional status of any country, territory or sea area, or concerning the delimitation of frontiers.

ABSTRACT

The paralic aquatic milieux which are situated between the marine and continental domains are extremely different as far as their size, morphology and genesis are concerned. Furthermore, the regional climatic and hydrographic conditions, along with the local hydrological patterns, induce a great variety and variability of the physical and chemical parameters and of the sedimentary deposits.

On the contrary, the biological populations are characterized by species strictly bound to that kind of milieu; their common qualitative and quantitative zonal organization is independent of salinity and/or salinity gradients, and they are relatively stable in spite of variations of the milieu. These original biological features allow the paralic milieux to be considered together as an autonomous ecological domain: it is proposed to call it the “paralic domain”

The parameter which appears largely to control the distribution of organisms and the features of living populations may be described as the time of renewal of the elements of marine origin at any given point, and is referred to as “confinement” (by comparison with the sea). A confinement scale is proposed from biological data, which essentially concerns the seaward part of the paralic domain, where thalassoid species still persist (Near paralic). Further from the sea, the Far paralic is characterized by the appearance of freshwater, or on the contrary, evaporitic associations, and changes gradually towards the continental domain.

In the light of these new ideas, it appears that, far from being marginal, the paralic domain has played an important role in the history of the biosphere and lithosphere of our planet.

Lastly, given the high organic productivity and original sedimentological features of the paralic domain, it appears that paralic basins are a considerable source of economic richness. Confinement may be in many cases the key to a rational exploitation of their economic potentialities.

FOREWORD

The work of synthesis presented here is a first stage in the combined studies of two naturalists, a biologist and a geologist working together on paralic milieux over several years. This study has led to a proposal of a new global concept of these very often little known milieux which may perhaps seem farfetched and over-ambitious. An attempt has been made to clarify all the geological, biological and economic implications, even the most audacious. In the process, many disciplines and specialities outside the authors' usual field of study have been touched upon, and it is possible that there may be errors. Further, this work is not intended to be exhaustive and is essentially the result of experience based - but not exclusively - on the study of Mediterranean lagoons. Thus other bio-geographical fields and certain milieux such as estuaries and delta channels will be mentioned in passsing, but the authors' limited experience of these environments, and bibliographic data, suggest that the pattern proposed here is applicable to them. The aim is not to impose any new dogma, but on the contrary, to stimulate new trends of thought in each speciality so that better scientific knowledge of the Paralic Domain may be acquired, and its economic value better developed.

The fortuitous meeting in Corsica in the autumn of 1978 would have been without result, and the Paralic Domain Study Group would no doubt never have been created without the financial and practical help of the Compagnie Française des Pétroles, and the presence of André Maurin to whom grateful thanks is extended at the beginning of this text. He is associated with the very “theory” of the Paralic Domain along with Guy François Frisoni whose amiable competence in the field of phytoplankton was of considerable help.

It is not possible to mention here the names of the many people who helped in the various studies which constitute the basis of this work and the authors hereby sincerely thank them all. But special appreciation is expressed to Jacquaeline Gaudin and the team at the Antenne Graphique du CNRS at the Laboratory of Geology who contributed to the organization of this work, and to Professor André Jauzein who has kindly contributed the preface to this sixteenth volume of the collection which he initiated in 1967 and which will no doubt be the last published before his departure for a well-deserved retirement.

N.B. Certain commentaries or digressions which would have been inappropriate within the body of the text have been included in Appendix 3.

FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS
Rome, 1989


Hyperlinks to non-FAO Internet sites do not imply any official endorsement of or responsibility for the opinions, ideas, data or products presented at these locations, or guarantee the validity of the information provided. The sole purpose of links to non-FAO sites is to indicate further information available on related topics.

This electronic document has been scanned using optical character recognition (OCR) software. FAO declines all responsibility for any discrepancies that may exist between the present document and its original printed version.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

ABSTRACT

FOREWORD

INTRODUCTION

1.    MORPHOLOGICAL, GEOCHEMICAL AND SEDIMENT DIVERSITY OF PARALIC MILIEUX

1.1    Morphological and genetic diversity of paralic basins

1.2    Hydrochemical gradient

1.2.1    Mediterranean examples

1.2.2    Examples outside the Mediterranean

1.2.3    Extreme examples

1.2.4    Conclusion

1.3    The sedimentological diversity of paralic milieux

1.4    Conclusion

2.    THE BIOLOGICAL UNITY OF PARALIC MILIEUX

2.1    The existence of strictly paralic species

2.2    Biological zoning of paralic milieux

2.2.1    The distribution of benthic species

2.2.2    Biological gradients

2.3    The influence of salinity upon marine species

2.4    The stability of paralic communities

2.5    Conclusion

3.    CONFINEMENT: THE FUNDAMENTAL PARAMETER OF THE PARALIC DOMAIN

3.1    The reasons for a mistaken approach

3.2    The search for the fundamental parameter of the paralic domain

3.3    General organization of the paralic domain

3.4    The establishment of a confinement scale

3.5    The position of several Mediterranean basins on the confinement scale

3.5.1    Bahiret el Biban

3.5.2    Mar Chica of Nador

3.5.3    Lagoon of Logarou

3.5.4    Lagoons of Tsoukalio and Rodia

3.5.5    Lagoons of Diana and Urbino

3.5.6    Lagoon of Biguglia

3.5.7    Lake Melah

3.5.8    Palavas lagoons

3.5.9    Bermuda Triangle (Santa Pola, Spain)

3.6    Adjustment of other biological compartments into the confinement scale

3.6.1    The phytoplanktonic communities of paralic milieux

3.6.2    The ichthyofauna

3.7    Quantitative biological gradient

3.7.1    Phytoplanktonic biomass and biomass of the benthic macrofauna

3.7.2    Production of soft bottom pelecypoda

3.8    Qualitative and quantitiative biological zoning of the paralic macrobenthos on hard substrate

3.8.1    Biological zoning

3.8.2    Biological gradients

3.9    Conclusions regarding the confinement parameter

4.    HYPOTHESES CONCERNING THE INFLUENCE OF CONFINEMENT ON PARALIC COMMUNITIES

4.1    Confinement in time, stabilization of the gradient, the role of depth

4.2    Intracontinental “paralic” basins

4.3    Importance of trace elements in the biological expression of confinement

4.4    Conclusion regarding the influence of confinement

5.    THE SCIENTIFIC IMPORTANCE OF THE PARALIC DOMAIN

5.1    From a biological and paleontological point of view

5.2    From a geological point of view

6.    THE ECONOMIC IMPORTANCE OF THE PARALIC DOMAIN

6.1    Mineral production

6.2    Food production

6.2.1    Gathering of “sea food”

6.2.2    Halieutic production

6.2.3    Aquaculture

6.3    Future prospects

6.3.1    Biomass

6.3.2    A strategy for the development of the paralic domain

7.    CONCLUSIONS

BIBLIOGRAPHY

LIST OF TABLES

1.    Taxonomic resources of the phytoplankton in various Mediterranean paralic basins

2.    Number of species and diversity of the ichthyological population of the lagoons of the eastern plain of Corsica

3.    “Sedentary” species: percentage of captures

4.    Quantity of molluscs in the Etang du Prévost

5.    Average values of density and biomass, annual production of the main Pelecypod Molluscs at different stations in the Etang du Prévost

6.    Some heavy metal concentrations measured in the tissues of marine and/or paralic species

7.    Comparison of the number of species in the caspian fauna and the Mediterranean fauna

8.    Monthly variations of the total lagunar algal biomass. Etang de Prévost

9.    Monthly variations of the lagunar algal biomass for the four principal types. Etang du Prévost

10.  Present-day stratigraphic classification of the Paleogene formations in the Paris Basic (Pomerol, 1973), and equivalences with the classification of Furon and Soyer (1947)

11.  Composition of total thalossoid fauns for each of the Paleogene layers of the Paris Basin

LIST OF FIGURES

CHART OF PARALIC SITES STUDIED BY THE AUTHORS

1.    Map of isohalines in the Etang d'Urbino

2.    Salinity levels (in 0/00) in the Etang du Prévost

3.    Total concentrations (in g/l) in the surface waters of the Bahiret el Biban

4.    Salinity levels (0/00) in the Etang de Biguglia

5.    Salinity levels (0/00) of the Dybsø Fjord

6.    Macrophytobenthic associations in the Dybsø Fjord

7.    Salinity levels (0/00) in the Kysing Fjord

8.    Mangrove around the Grand Cul de Sac Marin

9.    Two paralic basins in the Guadeloupe Mangrove and their surface water concentration levels

10.  Map of C1- concentration in the waters of the Khour el Aadid

11.  The Bocana de Virrila and its total concentration levels

12.  The salt marsh of Salin-de-Giraud

13.  The Baltic Sea and its salinity levels

14.  Plant associations in the salt marsh of Salin-de-Giraud

15.  Quantitative variations of benthic macrofauna in the Etang de prévost and the Bahiret el Biban

16.  Mean salinities relating to decrease of molluscan species in the North Sea-Baltic transition area and difference of relative diversity of fossilizable fauna along Texas coast

17.  Diagram of the geochemical and biological organization of the paralic domain.

18.  Diagram of the dominant sedimentological features of the paralic domain

19.  A diagrammatic representation of the biological zoning in the pattern of the Mediterranean paralic ecosystem

20.  Diagrammatic map of confinement zones in the Bahiret el Biban

21.  Diagrammatic map of confinement zones in the Nador lagoon

22.  Biological zoning in the lagoons of the Louros delta

23.  Biological zoning in the lagoons of the eastern plain of southern Corsica

24.  Biological zoning in the Etang de Biguglia

25.  Biological zoning in the “Lake” Melah

26.  Biological zoning in the Palavas lagoons

27.  Biological zoning in the the Bermuda Triangle (Santa Pola, Spain)

28.  Relative quantities of “migrant” and “sedentary” species in the ichthyofauna of the lagoons of Diana and Urbino

29.  A   A diagrammatic representation of the biological zoning defining the scale of confinement in the model of the Mediterranean paralic ecosystem

B   Variations showing the phytoplanktonic and benthic biomass in relation
to the confinement scale

30.  Annual malacological production of the Etang du Prévost

31.  Seasonal evolution of the malacological production of the Etang du Prévost

32.  Situation of the stations and levels of total malacological production in the different parts of the Etang du Prévost

33.  The biological gradients of the hard substrate macrobenthofauna in the Etang du Prévost

34.  Comparative production of some terrestrial and aquatic systems

35.  The potentialities of the Near paralic in the genesis of hydrocarbons in relation to confinement

36.  A comparison between demersal halieutic production and lagunar production along the Mediterranean coastline

37.  Map of aragonite content of the superficial sediments in the agoon of Logarou

38.  Situation of observation stations in the lagoons of Belle Plaine and Manche à Eau

39.  Abiotic parameters

40.  Analysis of abiotic data into principle components

41.  Multidimensional positioning of the stations according to similarities of benthic populations

42.  The Caspian Sea, bathymetric map

43.  Diagrammatic map of surface currents in the Caspian Sea

44.  Salinity levels in the Caspian Sea

45.  Benthic biomass distribution in the Caspian Sea

46.  Distribution of Nereis succinea biomass in the northern basin of the Caspian Sea

47.  Diagrammatic map of confinement zones in the Caspian Sea

48.  Diagrammatic section of the Caspian Sea and zoning linked to “bathymetric confinement”

49.  Map of total algal biomass distribution in the Etang du Prévost

50.  Monthly variations of total and specific algal biomass in the central zone of the Etang du Prévost

51.  Biological zoning of the intertidal zone on rocky surface at Port Aransas

52.  Extent of the different layers of the Paleogene in the Paris Basin

53.  Evolution of confinement in the Paris Basin during the Paleogene

54.  Situation of principal Stampian fossil deposits in the Paris Basin

55.  An attempt to reconstitute the confinement zones of the Lower Stampian in the Paris Basin

56.  An attempt to reconstitute the confinement zones of the Upper Stampian in the Paris Basin

57.  Diagrammatic paleogeographical map of the Stampian in N.W. France

58.  An attempt at paleogeographical reconstitution of the Stampian in N.W. France according to paleofauna

59.  The Baltic Sea and its principal basins

60.  Density of benthic macrofauna in the Baltic

61.  Biomass of benthic macrofauna in the Baltic

62.  Diversity of benthic macrofauna species in the Baltic

63.  Increase in percentage of the total number of individuals with the increase in the number of taxa, in different parts of the Baltic

64.  Distribution of Ophiura albida and Asterias rubens in the Kattegat and at the entrance of the Baltic Sea

65.  Map of confinement zones in the Baltic Sea

66.  Currents and principal tributaries of the Nador lagoon

67.  Bathymetry and granulometry of the sediments in the Nador lagoon

68.  Salinities and localization of the zone of maximal phytoplanktonic biomass

69.  Confinement zones in the Nador lagoon

70.  “Positive” socio-economic aspects in the immediate surroundings of the Nador lagoon

71.  Water and energy sources, means of access, around the Nador lagoon

72.  “Negative” socio-economic aspects in the immediate surroundings of the Nador lagoon

73.  Proposition for short-term aquacultural development for the Nador lagoon

74.  Longer-term development of aquacultural activities in the Nador lagoon, after modification of communication with the sea

Appendix 1:  CONVERSION TABLE OF DIFFERENT PARAMETERS

Appendix 2:  LIST OF THE PRINCIPAL COMMON MACROBENTHIC SPECIES IN THE MEDITERRANEAN PARALIC DOMAIN

Appendix 3:  COMMENTS AND DIGRESSIONS

Appendix 4:  USE OF THE NOTION OF CONFINEMENT IN AN ATTEMPT TO RECONSTITUTE PALEOMILIEUX IN THE PALEOGENE OF THE PARIS BASIN

Appendix 5:  THE BALTIC SEA

Appendix 6:  USE OF THE NOTION OF CONFINEMENT FOR AN AQUACULTURAL DEVELOPMENT SCHEME IN A PARALIC MILIEU EXAMPLE OF THE NADOR LAGOON (MOROCCO)

Appendix 7:  ONE LAST WORD ON GEOLOGY