E-library on Science-Policy Interface for ECA

Abstract

A tool for an intensified science-policy-practice interface

Päivinen R. & Toivonen R. (2015)

In this paper, the authors give some examples on existing science-policy interfaces and present a new tool for an intensified research-policy-practice interface for Finland. 

To co-produce or not to co-produce

Lemos, M. C., Arnott, J. C., Ardoin, N. M., Baja, K., Bednarek, A. T., Dewulf, A., ... & Wyborn, C. (2018)

This research delves into the practice of knowledge co-production, offering insights into its efficacy within various contexts and strategies to prevent potential negative outcomes.

Gustafsson, K. M., Díaz-Reviriego, I., & Turnhout, E. (2020)

The research offers valuable understanding on how enhancing capacity within the science-policy interface establishes foundational elements for fostering science-policy connections across various levels and scales, particularly within biodiversity and ecosystem services, extending its relevance beyond these domains.

Šucha, V., & Sienkiewicz, M. (2020)

This handbook presents proven strategies within the context of European policymaking, drawing from our experiences, without asserting their universal applicability, with the aim of providing practical utility and inspiration for a wide range of audiences.

Do we need a new science-policy interface for food systems?

The paper provides an analysis of the science-policy interface concerning food systems, addressing the necessity and hurdles associated with establishing a science-policy platform. It particularly emphasizes the complexities of social, cultural, and political aspects within food systems governance.

Enhancing science–policy interfaces for food

Singh, B. K., Arnold, T., Biermayr-Jenzano, P., Broerse, J., Brunori, G., Caron, P., ... & Wesseler, J. (2021)

The research delves into potential avenues for bolstering existing partnerships, mandates, and resources, or alternatively, envisioning a revamped mission for science-policy interfaces for food, aiming to provide pathways for heightened effectiveness and adaptability.

Hainzelin, E., Caron, P., Place, F., Alpha, A., Dury, S., Echeverria, R., & Harding, A. (2023)

The book assesses the significance of interfaces bridging science and policy, examining avenues to enhance their activity and efficacy. Strengthening, connecting, and streamlining these interfaces can ensure the consistency and success of food system transformation. 

 Jagannathan, K., Emmanuel, G., Arnott, J., Mach, K. J., Bamzai-Dodson, A., Goodrich, K., ... & Klenk, N. (2023).

The resulting agenda focuses on how to define success, support intermediaries, build trust, and evaluate the importance of consensus and its alternatives – all in the diverse contexts of science-society-decision-making interactions.

Mainstreaming nature-based solutions: What role do Communities of Practice play in delivering a paradigm shift? 

King, P., Martin-Ortega, J., Armstrong, J., Ferré, M., & Bark, R. H. (2023)

 To mainstream nature-based solutions, a fundamental shift in environmental management is required. This study evaluates the role that Communities of Practice can play as platforms to foster social learning to drive such a paradigm shift, using a multi-loop social learning framework.

Science for policy handbook

Chapter 15. Communicating Science in a Policy Context to a Broader Audience

Hajdu, M., & Simoneau, C. (2020)

 The chapter covers approaches to different types of audiences (senior policy-makers, members of parliaments and other politicians; journalists and social media influencers; local communities), and gives advices on clear writing, visual communication, and tailoring the message.

Webb, P., & Sonnino, R. (2021)

The High-Level Expert Group (HLEG), assembled by the European Commission in 2021, is tasked to explore the needs, feasibility and options for enhancing science-policy interfaces (SPIs) that could kick start and substantially support the ambitious goal of food systems transformation in the coming decades. Based on their analysis of a sample of existing SPIs, the HLEG concludes that, while a number of them do exemplary work, an additional framework linking local, national, regional and international levels, as well as different facets of the food system, is required to sustain food system transformation. The HLEG will draw on the outcome of the UN Food System Summit and Pre-Summit to elaborate a more detailed proposal during the second phase of its work, due for completion in May 2022.

This book identifies and explains the role of citizen science within innovation in science and society, and as a vibrant and productive science-policy interface. The scope of this volume is global, geared towards identifying solutions and lessons to be applied across science, practice and policy. The chapters consider the role of citizen science in the context of the wider agenda of open science and open innovation, and discuss progress towards responsible research and innovation, two of the most critical aspects of science today.

Turning science into policy: Challenges and experiences from the science-policy interface

Watson, R. T. (2005)

This paper discusses key issues in the science-policy interface. It stresses the importance of linking the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity to the Millennium Development Goals and to issues of immediate concern to policy-makers such as the economy, security and human health. It briefly discusses the process of decision-making and how the scientific and policy communities have successfully worked together on global environmental issues such as stratospheric ozone depletion and climate change, and the critical role of international assessments in providing the scientific basis for informed policy at the national and international level.

A rationale for science–policy interfaces

Science for the post-normal age

In response to the challenges of policy issues of risk and the environment, a new type of science-‘post-normal’-is emerging. This is analysed in contrast to traditional problem-solving strategies, including core science, applied science, and professional consultancy.

The changing role of nation states in international environmental assessments—the case of the IPCC. Global environmental change, 13 (2), 113-123

By analysing the case study of the IPCC, the paper focuses on the role of individual nation states played in international assessments and how this role changed over time and why.

Explaining the Evolution of the IPCC Structure and Process

This paper examines the processes which led to the creation of the IPCC and how it has evolved over two assessment cycles. The paper attempts to address the question of whether such an assessment set-up was necessary, if indeed it has been relevant, and what some indicators might be to evaluate the performance of the IPCC.